The Performance of Seaport Clusters - RePub - Erasmus Universiteit ...
The Performance of Seaport Clusters - RePub - Erasmus Universiteit ...
The Performance of Seaport Clusters - RePub - Erasmus Universiteit ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
184<br />
<strong>The</strong> <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Seaport</strong> <strong>Clusters</strong><br />
12.2 Strengths and weaknesses <strong>of</strong> Durban’s port cluster<br />
Table 80 shows the score <strong>of</strong> Durban’s port cluster compared to the score Richard’s Bay<br />
(RB) and the average score <strong>of</strong> the 6 port clusters.<br />
Table 80: Strengths and weaknesses <strong>of</strong> Durban’s port cluster<br />
Variable D RB Research findings<br />
<strong>The</strong> level <strong>of</strong> congestion<br />
-2.1 1.8<br />
Significantly worse than in Richard’s Bay<br />
and other 6 ports<br />
<strong>The</strong> level <strong>of</strong> land prices and <strong>of</strong>fice rents<br />
-1.3 3.1<br />
Significantly worse than in Richard’s Bay<br />
and other 6 ports<br />
<strong>The</strong> presence <strong>of</strong> intermediaries<br />
-0.6 1.7<br />
Significantly worse than in Richard’s Bay<br />
and other 6 ports<br />
<strong>The</strong> presence <strong>of</strong> a labor force<br />
<strong>The</strong> presence <strong>of</strong> cluster entry barriers<br />
2.2 1.5<br />
(access to local knowledge, networks and<br />
capital)<br />
-0.6 -0.3<br />
<strong>The</strong> presence <strong>of</strong> cluster exit barriers<br />
(immobile staff and fixed investments)<br />
0.2 0.0<br />
<strong>The</strong> quality <strong>of</strong> collective action regimes<br />
93<br />
2.6 2.3<br />
<strong>The</strong> presence <strong>of</strong> knowledge spillovers 2.5 0.9 Significantly better than in Richard’s Bay<br />
<strong>The</strong> diversity <strong>of</strong> the cluster population<br />
3.3 0.4<br />
Significantly better than in Richard’s Bay<br />
and other 6 ports<br />
<strong>The</strong> presence <strong>of</strong> a culture <strong>of</strong> trust<br />
3.2 0.8<br />
Significantly better than in Richard’s Bay<br />
and other 6 ports<br />
<strong>The</strong> presence <strong>of</strong> customers and suppliers<br />
3.4 1.5<br />
Significantly better than in Richard’s Bay<br />
and other 6 ports<br />
<strong>The</strong> presence <strong>of</strong> embedded leader firms<br />
2.8 0.6<br />
Significantly better than in Richard’s Bay<br />
and other 6 ports<br />
<strong>The</strong> presence <strong>of</strong> internal competition 1.9 -0.5 Significantly better than in Richard’s Bay<br />
Average scores on a scale from –5 (very bad) to +5 (very good)<br />
* Significantly higher score than in other two regions<br />
** Significantly lower score than in two other regions<br />
<strong>The</strong> weaknesses <strong>of</strong> Durban’s port cluster are first the level <strong>of</strong> congestion, second the level <strong>of</strong><br />
land prices and <strong>of</strong>fice rents and third the presence <strong>of</strong> intermediaries.<br />
93 This score is very high compared to the evaluation <strong>of</strong> the five regimes: compared to Richard’s<br />
Bay the quality is good, but a comparison with the other cases would be misleading.