01.03.2013 Views

The Performance of Seaport Clusters - RePub - Erasmus Universiteit ...

The Performance of Seaport Clusters - RePub - Erasmus Universiteit ...

The Performance of Seaport Clusters - RePub - Erasmus Universiteit ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

184<br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Performance</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Seaport</strong> <strong>Clusters</strong><br />

12.2 Strengths and weaknesses <strong>of</strong> Durban’s port cluster<br />

Table 80 shows the score <strong>of</strong> Durban’s port cluster compared to the score Richard’s Bay<br />

(RB) and the average score <strong>of</strong> the 6 port clusters.<br />

Table 80: Strengths and weaknesses <strong>of</strong> Durban’s port cluster<br />

Variable D RB Research findings<br />

<strong>The</strong> level <strong>of</strong> congestion<br />

-2.1 1.8<br />

Significantly worse than in Richard’s Bay<br />

and other 6 ports<br />

<strong>The</strong> level <strong>of</strong> land prices and <strong>of</strong>fice rents<br />

-1.3 3.1<br />

Significantly worse than in Richard’s Bay<br />

and other 6 ports<br />

<strong>The</strong> presence <strong>of</strong> intermediaries<br />

-0.6 1.7<br />

Significantly worse than in Richard’s Bay<br />

and other 6 ports<br />

<strong>The</strong> presence <strong>of</strong> a labor force<br />

<strong>The</strong> presence <strong>of</strong> cluster entry barriers<br />

2.2 1.5<br />

(access to local knowledge, networks and<br />

capital)<br />

-0.6 -0.3<br />

<strong>The</strong> presence <strong>of</strong> cluster exit barriers<br />

(immobile staff and fixed investments)<br />

0.2 0.0<br />

<strong>The</strong> quality <strong>of</strong> collective action regimes<br />

93<br />

2.6 2.3<br />

<strong>The</strong> presence <strong>of</strong> knowledge spillovers 2.5 0.9 Significantly better than in Richard’s Bay<br />

<strong>The</strong> diversity <strong>of</strong> the cluster population<br />

3.3 0.4<br />

Significantly better than in Richard’s Bay<br />

and other 6 ports<br />

<strong>The</strong> presence <strong>of</strong> a culture <strong>of</strong> trust<br />

3.2 0.8<br />

Significantly better than in Richard’s Bay<br />

and other 6 ports<br />

<strong>The</strong> presence <strong>of</strong> customers and suppliers<br />

3.4 1.5<br />

Significantly better than in Richard’s Bay<br />

and other 6 ports<br />

<strong>The</strong> presence <strong>of</strong> embedded leader firms<br />

2.8 0.6<br />

Significantly better than in Richard’s Bay<br />

and other 6 ports<br />

<strong>The</strong> presence <strong>of</strong> internal competition 1.9 -0.5 Significantly better than in Richard’s Bay<br />

Average scores on a scale from –5 (very bad) to +5 (very good)<br />

* Significantly higher score than in other two regions<br />

** Significantly lower score than in two other regions<br />

<strong>The</strong> weaknesses <strong>of</strong> Durban’s port cluster are first the level <strong>of</strong> congestion, second the level <strong>of</strong><br />

land prices and <strong>of</strong>fice rents and third the presence <strong>of</strong> intermediaries.<br />

93 This score is very high compared to the evaluation <strong>of</strong> the five regimes: compared to Richard’s<br />

Bay the quality is good, but a comparison with the other cases would be misleading.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!