The Performance of Seaport Clusters - RePub - Erasmus Universiteit ...
The Performance of Seaport Clusters - RePub - Erasmus Universiteit ...
The Performance of Seaport Clusters - RePub - Erasmus Universiteit ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Chapter 12 – Analyzing Strenghts and Weaknesses <strong>of</strong> <strong>Seaport</strong> <strong>Clusters</strong> 185<br />
<strong>The</strong> port cluster <strong>of</strong> Durban possesses various strengths. First, the level <strong>of</strong> internal<br />
competition is high, compared to Richard’s Bay. Second and third, Durban is more diverse<br />
and has more knowledge spill-overs than Richard’s Bay. Fourth, the level <strong>of</strong> trust is high;<br />
fifth, Durban is well endowed with leader firms; and sixth, relatively many customers and<br />
suppliers are present in Durban.<br />
<strong>The</strong>se strengths and weaknesses show that Durban is a strong cluster. <strong>The</strong> cluster<br />
economies are stronger in Durban than in Richard’s Bay. However, the concentration <strong>of</strong><br />
cluster activities has led to diseconomies <strong>of</strong> high land prices and congestion. Addressing<br />
those two weaknesses is a central challenge for improving Durban’s performance. Only data<br />
on container throughput and overall throughput are available. Both are given in Table 81.<br />
Table 81: Market share <strong>of</strong> Durban, total throughput and containers in South Africa<br />
Year Durban<br />
Total cargo (tons) Containers (TEU)<br />
Richards<br />
Bay Saldanha Cape town<br />
Port<br />
Elizabeth Durban Cape town<br />
Port<br />
Elizabeth<br />
1990 24.4% 49.9% 15.6% 4.9% 4.0% 68.0% 19.6% 10.0%<br />
1991 23.4% 52.7% 145.0% 5.1% 3.5% 68.5% 20.1% 9.0%<br />
1992 22.9% 52.7% 14.1% 5.3% 3.7% 65.4% 21.7% 10.4%<br />
1993 20.4% 55.6% 15.4% 4.8% 2.9% 66.7% 21.2% 9.8%<br />
1994 19.8% 53.3% 16.1% 5.7% 3.1% 65.5% 21.0% 10.8%<br />
1995 19.3% 54.6% 16.2% 5.5% 3.7% 63.7% 22.4% 10.9%<br />
1996 21.9% 54.7% 14.2% 4.7% 3.7% 65.5% 20.7% 11.1%<br />
1997 20.6% 55.1% 14.9% 5.0% 3.7% 64.8% 20.9% 11.9%<br />
1998 20.4% 56.3% 14.8% 4.4% 3.8% 65.2% 19.7% 12.4%<br />
1999 18.2% 57.3% 14.9% 4.9% 4.3% 61.1% 20.7% 15.8%<br />
2000 20.1% 56.2% 14.5% 4.7% 4.1% 64.4% 19.7% 14.3%<br />
Source: National Port Authority <strong>of</strong> South Africa (2003)<br />
This table shows that Durban has lost market share overall, but almost exclusively because<br />
coal exports increased substantially. <strong>The</strong>se volumes are handled in Richard’s Bay. In<br />
containers, Durban still has a dominant market share, only Port Elisabeth managed to gain<br />
some market share. However, this is mainly because <strong>of</strong> increasing volumes in their captive