23.03.2013 Views

Download (23MB) - University of Salford Institutional Repository

Download (23MB) - University of Salford Institutional Repository

Download (23MB) - University of Salford Institutional Repository

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Hand shakes for example were infrequent, to the point <strong>of</strong> being alien 3. In<br />

greetings, the enthusiastic "und wie gehts" [and how are you] in German<br />

appeared in English as a rather throwaway and cursory "Hows it goi n'... al right',<br />

<strong>of</strong>ten uttered as the speaker's main involvement was focused elsewhere, in<br />

some other task such as taking guests coats, attending to food in the kitchen, or<br />

chastising nearby children. Eye contact was brief and not necessarily<br />

choreographed with'ask after other'type questions, and smiles were usually<br />

only initiated as a result <strong>of</strong> some 'quip' to "How are you questions"<br />

("Knackered! ", "Not three bad", "I was alright'till I saw that shirt you're wearin"').<br />

During departure phases, the'Vielleicht k6nnen wir uns nachste Woche treffen"<br />

[Perhaps we could meet next week] had as its English equivalent "We'll have to<br />

do this again sometime". However, whereas this German initiator invariably led<br />

to a discussion <strong>of</strong> mutually available times, and more <strong>of</strong>ten than not a fixing <strong>of</strong><br />

an appointment there and then (one that was taken to be as fixed as a doctors<br />

appointment and subsequently expected to be met on time), the English version<br />

was <strong>of</strong>ten met with "Yeah, we'll give you a call when we know what we're doin"'<br />

or something similarly not-committal. Subsequent calls were not in actuality<br />

expected (see comments in House 1996), nor usually made 4.<br />

The mai ,n phases <strong>of</strong> the majority <strong>of</strong> gatherings from which my data are<br />

taken involved some central eating and drinking activity. Normally, this was<br />

done with participants sat together around a table that had been prepared prior<br />

to participants' arrival by the host(ess). Consequently, throughout main phases,<br />

topic talk <strong>of</strong>ten focused on the food presented and arranged by the host.<br />

Enquiries about one or the other aspect <strong>of</strong> the immediate environment were<br />

common. For instance, asking whatthis' or'thatfood item was, expressing<br />

interest in particular recipes or cooking techniques used, and <strong>of</strong>fering<br />

compliments to the host(ess) were common in both data sets. Often, if food was<br />

not available for such solidaric focus (for instance before it was served / after it<br />

had been eaten), sociability props would receive similar attention, for example<br />

crockery, tablecloths, or the layout <strong>of</strong> the table. Failing this, environmental props<br />

such as clothing / jewellery worn by one or the other participants, furniture, or, if<br />

outside some aspect <strong>of</strong> the garden might provide a suitable joint focus <strong>of</strong><br />

attention. This complimentary activity appeared in the main phases <strong>of</strong><br />

gatherings in both cultures, in particular, at the beginning and end <strong>of</strong> eating<br />

121

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!