23.03.2013 Views

Download (23MB) - University of Salford Institutional Repository

Download (23MB) - University of Salford Institutional Repository

Download (23MB) - University of Salford Institutional Repository

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

with a 'that's nothing special' type response' effectively smothering the flames <strong>of</strong><br />

our uniqueness under the blanket <strong>of</strong> commonality.<br />

A nice example <strong>of</strong> a non-ratification and non-support <strong>of</strong> a negative claim<br />

can be see to occur in the episode I have entitled 'Chris's Lad'.<br />

Excerpt 6.9 'Chris's Lad'<br />

KPi5 and PN (both late middle aged working class males) have been talking<br />

about the cassette recorder and my research activities.<br />

I KPs: He got so high a ma:: rk (1.5) at <strong>Salford</strong> <strong>University</strong>=they said (. ) we'll<br />

2 pay for him to go in for that and [we'll give you a teachin' post here=<br />

3 PN: [Yeah<br />

4 PN: =Yeah<br />

5 0<br />

6 KPs: And then pay for your doctorate (1) for you're:: =course (. ) and it's up<br />

7 li: ke (. ) >this year<<br />

8 (1)<br />

9 PN: CHRIS'S LAD's goin't Oxford you know (1) Chris Tudor (0.5) Dancin'<br />

10 (0.5)<br />

11 KPs: Oh Yeah<br />

12 (1)<br />

13 PN: He's passed for Oxford<br />

14 (0.5)<br />

15 KPs: Oh::<br />

16 ((Drinks handed out aside, KP turns to drinks))<br />

17 KPs: Cheers Peter<br />

In this episode <strong>of</strong> sociable chat, KP pr<strong>of</strong>fers a negative claim by extolling<br />

the virtues <strong>of</strong> his son (myself) as being intelligent and employed at a university.<br />

Both KIP and PN are working class, and neither have been to or have had<br />

relatives attending university (nor have any <strong>of</strong> the other co-present participants).<br />

Based on this shared informational state, KP then can be relatively certain that<br />

my status as 'academic researcher'will form a safe basis for uniqueness claim,<br />

if only by association (see Chapter 7). However, PN responds in a manner that<br />

does not unproblematically ratify and support this negative claim. Instead, PN<br />

rather effectively claims similarity, indeed effectively goes further by'topping'<br />

<strong>Salford</strong> (an urban lower ranking university) with Oxford (perhaps the highest<br />

status university in the land). KP (somewhat crest-fallen) subsequently drops<br />

the claim and initiates a joint focus <strong>of</strong> attention away from the conversation and<br />

towards the drinks. Again, one might perceive this as being inappropriate or<br />

1 rA

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!