23.03.2013 Views

Download (23MB) - University of Salford Institutional Repository

Download (23MB) - University of Salford Institutional Repository

Download (23MB) - University of Salford Institutional Repository

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

collective past peppered with individualised past activities; Agonisers also<br />

seemed to allow for both the expression solidarity and commonality over a<br />

common problem as well as more individualistic ones; Reportables such as<br />

travel talk appeared to allow participants the conversational space to present<br />

unique accounts whilst at the same time allowing for the expression <strong>of</strong><br />

commonality or solidarity; and finally Biographicals allowed for a pr<strong>of</strong>fered<br />

individuated account to be assimilated solidarically with the biographies <strong>of</strong> other<br />

participants present. Thus, although these topic areas appear to some degree<br />

inherently differentiating, there was scope for the expression <strong>of</strong> solidaritY9. Such<br />

sociable topics then variously allowed for the collective expression <strong>of</strong> both<br />

solidarity / communality, and autonomy / difference (see fig. 3).<br />

Fig. 5.3 Sociable Topic Categories as Resource for Face Needs<br />

English German<br />

Salient recur(ing topic frame<br />

REMINISCENCES AGONISERS REPORTABLES BIOGRAPHICALS<br />

------------------------------------------------------------<br />

NB: Topics are not fixed but move along these continua as they are<br />

conversationally developed and various face needs are realised.<br />

-----------------------------------------------------<br />

11414

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!