23.03.2013 Views

Download (23MB) - University of Salford Institutional Repository

Download (23MB) - University of Salford Institutional Repository

Download (23MB) - University of Salford Institutional Repository

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

At the time, this proposal seemed essentially clear cut in terms <strong>of</strong>:<br />

a) what the'research problem'was; and b) how I would set about<br />

addressing this problem. However it soon became clear, upon gathering<br />

and consulting the literature on face and facework, and looking at the<br />

nature <strong>of</strong> the conversational data coming in, that this would not to be such<br />

a clear cut systematic investigation. I quickly came to realise that the<br />

conceptual, methodological and analytic tools for executing such a study<br />

were far from the clinical and incisive ones I expected them to be. As a<br />

result, the study took on a double mandate: First, the original task <strong>of</strong><br />

addressing German-English differences; and second the task <strong>of</strong> finding a<br />

framework and set <strong>of</strong> concepts and analytical tools suitable for the<br />

analysis <strong>of</strong> facework in naturally occurring conversation from two different<br />

cultures.<br />

This thesis might best be described as equally exploratory and<br />

empirical in nature. This dual mandate is subsequently reflected in the<br />

organisation <strong>of</strong> the study in terms <strong>of</strong> the individual chapters, nature <strong>of</strong> the<br />

analysis, and set <strong>of</strong> propositions constituting the overall thesis.<br />

Organisation <strong>of</strong> Chapters<br />

In Chapter 11 shall begin by considering key foundational texts, to<br />

which the majority <strong>of</strong> facework studies can be conceptually traced,<br />

namely, the work <strong>of</strong> G<strong>of</strong>fman (1967) and Brown and Levinson (1987). 1 will<br />

suggest that the fundamental premises set out in these two bodies <strong>of</strong> work<br />

are essential, not only to understanding the concept <strong>of</strong> face and facework<br />

practices in discourse per se, but particularly, to cross-cultural comparative<br />

analysis between cultures. Following this I shall point to recent conceptual<br />

debates addressing the concept <strong>of</strong> face as a universal, drawing<br />

particularly on work conducted by scholars focussing on non-Western<br />

conceptualisations, largely in response to Brown and Levinson. In<br />

essence, I shall show how, in order to fully understand face and facework<br />

as a universal phenomenon, the concept <strong>of</strong> the self - particular that<br />

advanced in Western readings <strong>of</strong> face and facework - requires some<br />

5

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!