23.03.2013 Views

Download (23MB) - University of Salford Institutional Repository

Download (23MB) - University of Salford Institutional Repository

Download (23MB) - University of Salford Institutional Repository

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

the environment, activities, and prevailing ethos are drawn upon to create a<br />

dramatic framework within which such selves can be made sense <strong>of</strong>.<br />

Typically for English sociable topic management in general (see<br />

Chapter 5), there is much humour employed in the general handling <strong>of</strong><br />

'Cookie's Party' (see also 'Tommy Fields' below). This includes the invocation<br />

<strong>of</strong> both comical figures per se (e. g. LM failing downstairs [line 6]; the sarcastic<br />

Andy Pandy [line 64-65], DB attending as nob [line 74]), as well as treating<br />

more serious ones humorously (e. g. the 'bonking' couple ripping the shower<br />

<strong>of</strong>f the wall [line 28]). As with most English sociable conversation, what seems<br />

to be important in conversationally handing 'Cookie's Party' is not such<br />

matters as factual accuracy (e. g. whether or not LM actually did fall<br />

downstairs and land on her feet without spilling the can <strong>of</strong> lager, or whether a<br />

'bonking' couple really did rip the shelves <strong>of</strong>f the wal I- both <strong>of</strong> which seem<br />

dubious assertions), but rather what might be better termed as dramatic<br />

intensity (Cf. G<strong>of</strong>fman 1974).<br />

Fundamental to the reading <strong>of</strong> sociable conversation that I have been<br />

advancing throughout this study is the proposition that such conversation in<br />

both cultures relies not on conversational contributions per se, but rather the<br />

mobilisation <strong>of</strong> particular sociable selves. That is, sociable conversation is not<br />

a result <strong>of</strong> linguistic practices but <strong>of</strong> symbolic ones (see Chapter 7). In<br />

'Cookie's Party', we can clearly identify certain salient English sociable selves<br />

at work. In the first instance these might be subsumed under a heading<br />

specific to this particular conversation like 'party goers'. However, the<br />

construction <strong>of</strong> such party going selves is achieved through the mobilisation <strong>of</strong><br />

more generic selves in line with those identified in Chapter 7. Such generic<br />

selves are mobilised as both conversational players and (that is, the self that<br />

handles the talk) and as conversational images (that is, the self that is<br />

handled in the talk) (see 7.1).<br />

As players - i. e., in effect'harried fabricator[s] <strong>of</strong> impressions involved<br />

in the ... task <strong>of</strong> staging a performance' (G<strong>of</strong>fman 1969,222), the most salient<br />

<strong>of</strong> these selves mobilised in 'Cookie's Party' are what was referred to earlier<br />

244

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!