27.06.2013 Views

Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on Knowledge ...

Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on Knowledge ...

Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on Knowledge ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Ettore Bolisani, Marco Paiola and Enrico Scarso<br />

Table 13: Use <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> knowledge protecti<strong>on</strong> methods by KIBS subsector<br />

Modality (% <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> positive resp<strong>on</strong>ses)<br />

KIBS subsector<br />

ICT D&C PFS<br />

Total<br />

Registered Brands 14.9% 27.0% 21.7% 21.3%<br />

Patents 7.1% 8.2% 5.1% 6.8%<br />

Registered Designs/Models 0.0% 10.1% 3.8% 4.7%<br />

Copyright 1.3% 9.4% 3.2% 4.7%<br />

Industrial secret 4.5% 7.5% 3.2% 5.1%<br />

O<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r 1.9% 7.5% 4.5% 4.7%<br />

N<strong>on</strong>e 77.3% 54.1% 72.0% 67.6%<br />

There are differences across subsectors and in relati<strong>on</strong> to <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> kind <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> service <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>fered (which can<br />

influence <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> possibility <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> protecting knowledge). But, as can be noted, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> adopti<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> measures to<br />

protect knowledge is uncomm<strong>on</strong>, and with <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> excepti<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> registered brands <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> o<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r methods are<br />

<strong>on</strong>ly marginally employed (Table 13).<br />

Table 14: Use <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> knowledge protecti<strong>on</strong> methods by size class<br />

Modality<br />

Size class<br />

Total<br />

(% <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> positive resp<strong>on</strong>ses)<br />

1-4 5-9 ≥10<br />

Registered Brands 18.2% 22.1% 35.1% 21.3%<br />

Patents 5.8% 6.6% 12.3% 6.8%<br />

Registered Designs/Models 5.1% 4.1% 3.5% 4.7%<br />

Copyright 5.8% 2.5% 3.5% 4.7%<br />

Industrial secret 5.1% 4.9% 5.3% 5.1%<br />

O<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r 5.1% 4.9% 5.3% 4.7%<br />

N<strong>on</strong>e 70.4% 66.4% 56.1% 67.6%<br />

As <strong>on</strong>e can expect, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> use <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> protecti<strong>on</strong> measures is more comm<strong>on</strong> for larger companies, although<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> general pattern remains <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> same (Table 14).<br />

4.8 Clients as sources <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> knowledge<br />

The importance <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> clients as sources <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> key knowledge was measured following <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> same procedure<br />

used in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> case <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> suppliers. Comparing data <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Table 15 with those <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Table 3 reveals that clients<br />

are c<strong>on</strong>sidered more important as knowledge sources than suppliers. This is in line with what <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

literature generally affirms (Kuusisto 2008), i.e. KIBS companies are characterized by a strict<br />

collaborati<strong>on</strong> with clients that are precious sources <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> knowledge for learning and developing new<br />

services. In particular 26.2% <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> companies c<strong>on</strong>sider clients having a high importance, while this value<br />

is 16.8% in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> case <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> suppliers. This is mainly due to PFS and ICT companies, since <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> percentage<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> companies that assign high importance increases from 11.0% to 24.2% and from 19.9% to 30.5%<br />

respectively passing form suppliers to clients.<br />

Table 15: Importance <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> clients as sources <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> knowledge by KIBS subsector<br />

Importance <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> clients as Subsector<br />

Total<br />

sources <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> knowledge<br />

ICT D&C PFS<br />

Little 24.7% 31.0% 31.2% 29.0%<br />

Medium 44.8% 44.9% 44.6% 44.8%<br />

High 30.5% 24.1% 24.2% 26.2%<br />

Also in this case, size doesn’t seem to be clearly correlated with this item (Table 16). As in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> case <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

suppliers, opini<strong>on</strong>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> larger companies are more polarised than those <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> smaller <strong>on</strong>es.<br />

Table 16: Importance <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> clients as sources <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> knowledge by size class<br />

Importance <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> clients as Size class<br />

Total<br />

5. C<strong>on</strong>clusi<strong>on</strong><br />

sources <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> knowledge<br />

1-4 5-9 ≥10<br />

Little 26.1% 32.2% 36.8% 29.0%<br />

Medium 48.1% 43.0% 31.6% 44.8%<br />

High 25.8% 24.8% 31.6% 26.2%<br />

The aim <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> this paper was to investigate <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> issue <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> adopti<strong>on</strong> and use <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> KM practices by <strong>Knowledge</strong>-<br />

Intensive Business Services (KIBS) companies. The survey used a stratified sample statistically<br />

representative <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> KIBS operating in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Veneto regi<strong>on</strong> (North-Eastern Italy) and bel<strong>on</strong>ging to three<br />

121

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!