27.06.2013 Views

Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on Knowledge ...

Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on Knowledge ...

Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on Knowledge ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Marguerite Cr<strong>on</strong>k<br />

2.3 Social capital and knowledge sharing in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> web 2 envir<strong>on</strong>ment<br />

Social capital is <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> shared accumulated resources that exist across social networks. <strong>Knowledge</strong> is<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> primary resource shared and accumulated in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> network. Social relati<strong>on</strong>s, <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>ten established for<br />

o<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r purposes, c<strong>on</strong>stitute informati<strong>on</strong> channels that reduce <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> amount <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> time and investment<br />

required to ga<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r informati<strong>on</strong>. (Nahapiet and Ghoshal 1998). As menti<strong>on</strong>ed above <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> amount and<br />

nature <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> what is being shared depends <strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> type <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> social capital. For example, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>re is mounting<br />

evidence dem<strong>on</strong>strating that where parties trust each o<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>y are more willing to engage in<br />

cooperative activity through which fur<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r trust may be generated (Fukuyama, 1995; Putnam, 1993;<br />

Tyler & Kramer, 1996). Morris et al (2010) suggests that web2 social network users actually use <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

network to both gain and share knowledge (as informati<strong>on</strong>, knowledge, or experience) by asking<br />

questi<strong>on</strong>s as <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>ir ‘status. In this study network users site speedier better quality informati<strong>on</strong>, as <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

motivator as it comes from a trusted source (group <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> friends).<br />

Studies <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> knowledge sharing in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> web 2 era have ventured down some different paths than in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

‘pre’ web 2 studies. For example, in relati<strong>on</strong> to social technologies ‘c<strong>on</strong>nectivists’ assert that<br />

knowledge is distributed across a network <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>necti<strong>on</strong>s, and <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>refore that learning c<strong>on</strong>sists <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

ability to c<strong>on</strong>struct and traverse those networks. Some domains <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> knowledge c<strong>on</strong>tain vast numbers <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

weak interrelati<strong>on</strong>s that, if properly exploited, can greatly amplify learning by a process <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> inference<br />

(Siemens, 2004; Downes 2006). This sounds very similar to ‘accumulated shared resources’ or social<br />

capital. These authors refer to learning specifically, but knowledge sharing/transfer is a precursor to<br />

learning.<br />

Hence <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> significance <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> web2 in knowledge sharing is not <strong>on</strong>ly to provide an excellent sharing<br />

platform but to assist in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> building <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> social capital which in turn fuels more knowledge sharing. (See<br />

figure 2.)<br />

Social Capital<br />

Web 2 SNS<br />

<strong>Knowledge</strong> Sharing<br />

Figure 2: The relati<strong>on</strong>ship between Social Capital and <strong>Knowledge</strong> Sharing, facilitated by Web 2 SNS.<br />

2.4 Social capital and intellectual capital<br />

Nahapiet and Ghoshal 1998 define "intellectual capital" as <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> “knowledge and knowing capability <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> a<br />

social collectivity, such as an organizati<strong>on</strong>, intellectual community, or pr<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>essi<strong>on</strong>al practice. They<br />

defend <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>ir definiti<strong>on</strong> in terms <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> its clear parallel with <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>cept <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> human capital, which embraces<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> acquired knowledge, skills, and capabilities that enable pers<strong>on</strong>s to act in new ways (Coleman,<br />

1988). They affirm <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> noti<strong>on</strong> that social capital facilitates <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> creati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> new intellectual capital<br />

(Nahapiet and Ghoshal 1998) through knowledge processes. (See figure 3)<br />

Social Capital<br />

<strong>Knowledge</strong> Sharing<br />

Intellectual Capital<br />

Figure 3: The relati<strong>on</strong>ship between Social Capital and Intellectual Capital, facilitated by <strong>Knowledge</strong><br />

Sharing<br />

2.5 Intellectual capital and knowledge sharing<br />

<strong>Knowledge</strong> sharing appears to be <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> intersecti<strong>on</strong> or pivotal point that both social capital and<br />

intellectual capital revolve around.<br />

Following Schumpeter (1934), Moran and Ghoshal (1996) have argued that all new resources,<br />

including knowledge, are created through two generic processes: namely, combinati<strong>on</strong> and exchange.<br />

218

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!