27.06.2013 Views

Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on Knowledge ...

Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on Knowledge ...

Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on Knowledge ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Radwan Kharabsheh, Ihab Magableh and Sukina Sawadha<br />

emerged that effectively managing knowledge can enhance performance, to date; however, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>re is<br />

limited empirical evidence.<br />

More importantly, a careful survey <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>se studies shows that even fewer studies investigated a<br />

direct link between KMPs and financial performance and new product success. New product success<br />

is especially important because it relates to a firm’s innovative performance, which captures <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

critical domains <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> companies’ competitive advantage, which can be defined as <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>tributi<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

product and process innovati<strong>on</strong>s to firm performance (Jiang and Li, 2009). A firm’s innovative<br />

performance is determined by its innovati<strong>on</strong> activities, such as R&D expenditure, patents, and new<br />

products. Also while this direct link is important in numerous industries because it draws attenti<strong>on</strong> to<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> importance <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> KMPs in organizati<strong>on</strong>s it is far more important in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> pharmaceutical industry.<br />

Ingelgard (2002) argued that <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> competitive advantage in <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> pharmaceutical industry is entangled<br />

with <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> company’s ability to generate new knowledge that can produce patents and new medicines<br />

that are turned into marketable products. Fur<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>rmore, most <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> studies showing a positive<br />

relati<strong>on</strong>ship between KMPs and OP were c<strong>on</strong>ducted in developed countries’ c<strong>on</strong>text. Few studies<br />

were c<strong>on</strong>ducted in developing countries such as Jordan.<br />

Therefore, this study aims to explore <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> extent <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> adopti<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> KMPs in pharmaceutical companies in<br />

Jordan. Fur<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> study aims to examine <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> relati<strong>on</strong>ship between KMPs and OP. While OP in itself<br />

is a useful metric <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> ultimate measures revolve around financial performance and new product<br />

success. The paper also examines <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> impact <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>trol variables: companies’ size and companies’<br />

age <strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> relati<strong>on</strong>ship between <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> KMPs and OP.<br />

2. C<strong>on</strong>ceptual framework <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> study<br />

It is essential to understand <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> definiti<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> knowledge before having a better understanding <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> KM<br />

(Ooi, 2009; Alrawi and Elkhatib, 2009). <strong>Knowledge</strong> is a multifaceted c<strong>on</strong>cept with multilayered<br />

meanings. As <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>re are different dimensi<strong>on</strong>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> knowledge, it is difficult to identify precisely what<br />

knowledge is. Liang et. al. (2007) defined knowledge as informati<strong>on</strong> that is relevant, acti<strong>on</strong>able, and<br />

linked to meaningful behavior and informati<strong>on</strong> that is especially characterized by its tacit elements that<br />

are derived from firsthand experience. Walczak (2005) defined knowledge as any data, skill, c<strong>on</strong>text,<br />

or informati<strong>on</strong> that enables high quality decisi<strong>on</strong> making and problem solving to occur.<br />

Ooi (2009) defined KM as a methodological method that enhances <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> capability <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> a company to<br />

assemble and organize <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> knowledge in order to improve <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> decisi<strong>on</strong> making ability and business<br />

strategy formulati<strong>on</strong> process. The knowledge to be managed includes both explicit, documented<br />

knowledge, and tacit, subjective knowledge. Chesebrough (2006) pointed out that KM is<br />

fundamentally <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> efforts <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> an organizati<strong>on</strong> to generate communicate and leverage intellectual<br />

assets. Rowley (1999) stated that KM is c<strong>on</strong>cerned with <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> exploitati<strong>on</strong> and development <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

knowledge assets <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> an organizati<strong>on</strong> with a view to fur<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>ring <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> organizati<strong>on</strong>’s objectives. Singh and<br />

Soltani (2010) argued that “most <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>ten, generating value from such assets involves sharing <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>m<br />

am<strong>on</strong>g employees, departments and even with o<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r companies in an effort to devise best practices”.<br />

This definiti<strong>on</strong>, Singh and Soltani (2010) argue says nothing about technology; while knowledge<br />

management is <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>ten facilitated by IT, technology by itself is not KM.<br />

As knowledge is created and disseminated throughout <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> firm, it has <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> potential to c<strong>on</strong>tribute to <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

firm’s value by enhancing its capability to resp<strong>on</strong>d to new and unusual situati<strong>on</strong>s (Percin, 2010).<br />

There is growing evidence that companies are increasingly investing in KM initiatives and establishing<br />

KM systems in order to acquire and better exploit this resource (Sarvary, 1999). The growing<br />

importance <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> knowledge as a critical resource has encouraged managers to pay greater attenti<strong>on</strong> to<br />

companies’ KM strategies and practices. Appropriate KM strategies and practices are important to<br />

ensure that <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> alignment <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> organizati<strong>on</strong>al processes, culture and KN-related in-formati<strong>on</strong> technology<br />

(IT) deployment produce effective knowledge creati<strong>on</strong>, sharing, and utilizati<strong>on</strong> (Zack, 1999).<br />

While researchers have sought to enhance OP by providing guidelines for appropriate KM strategies<br />

and practices, how different KM strategies and practices affect OP is not well understood (Choi, Po<strong>on</strong><br />

and Davis, 2008). The assumpti<strong>on</strong> underlying <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> practice <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> KM is that by locating and sharing useful<br />

knowledge, organizati<strong>on</strong>al performance will improve (Davenport and Prusak, 1998). Marque´s and<br />

Simo´n (2006) found that that companies that adopt KMPs obtain better results than <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>ir competitor<br />

and that KMPs have a positive incidence <strong>on</strong> firm performance. Kasim (2008) c<strong>on</strong>cluded that KMPs at<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> organizati<strong>on</strong>al level are a prerequisite for successful OP. A recent study by Zack et. al. (2009)<br />

507

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!