Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on Knowledge ...

Halimah Abdul Manaf, Steven Armstrong and Alan Lawton
Table 3: The result <strong>of</strong> moderator regression analysis for hypo<strong>the</strong>sis 6
Variables
Step 1
Standardized Coefficients
Beta
t Sig.
(Constant) 18.397 .000
Mentoring 1 .105* 1.714 .050
Institutional Personalization .153* 2.281 .023
Knowledge Sharing .126* 1.931 .050
Step 2
(Constant) 15.022 .000
Agreeableness .183* 3.121 .002
Openness .016 .266 .790
Conscientiousness .140* 2.472 .014
Step 3
(Constant) -3.229 .001
Agreeableness x Mentoring 2 2.568* 3.334 .001
Openness x Institutional Personalization -2.111* -2.142 .033
Conscientiousness x Mentoring 1 -1.197* -1.968 .050
Conscientiousness x Mentoring 2 -.989* -1.917 .046
Step 1 Step 2 Step 3
R 0.334 0.42 0.557
R² 0.111 0.177 0.31
Adj R² 0.091 0.149 0.236
R² Change 0.111 0.065 0.134
F Change 5.413 7.901 2.703
Sig F Change
* p< 0.05
0.000 0.000 0.000
Step 1 represents independent variables constructs and statistically significant regression coefficients.
The set <strong>of</strong> knowledge sharing practices variables entered at step 1 accounted for approximately 11%
<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> variance in individual performance. Table 3 reveals that <strong>the</strong>re are only 3 variables that make a
statistically significant contribution (p