27.06.2013 Views

Information and Knowledge Management using ArcGIS ModelBuilder

Information and Knowledge Management using ArcGIS ModelBuilder

Information and Knowledge Management using ArcGIS ModelBuilder

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Vered Holzmann <strong>and</strong> Ben Holzmann<br />

solicited through various channels of communication stressing subjects of common interests, thus,<br />

encouraging the members of these homogeneous groups to effectively contribute to the campaign.<br />

A single volunteer is normally nominated to represent all the group members <strong>and</strong> function as their<br />

speaker, <strong>and</strong> taking the responsibility to moderate the group’s performance while providing the<br />

campaign management with reliable classifications pertaining to the member’s positions <strong>and</strong> opinions<br />

regarding the c<strong>and</strong>idate’s behavior.<br />

Every methodology used to identify these different groups of prospective supporters hinges on the<br />

ability of the campaign’s analysts to utilize the continuously accumulated knowledge in order to<br />

update the specifications defining the criteria for the clustering processes. Cluster analysis was<br />

defined by Jain et al. (1999) as “the organization of a collection of patterns (usually represented as a<br />

vector of measurements, or a point in a multidimensional space) into clusters based on similarity”.<br />

Clustering is an advanced statistical method used to represent relationships, based on measures of<br />

proximity between elements, expressed by maximum distances between groups <strong>and</strong> minimal<br />

distances within each group. It suggests an unsupervised classification <strong>and</strong> grouping of similar<br />

objects into subsets that are determined by the clustering process itself. Implementation of clustering<br />

in management sciences is common in numerous applications including studies related to computer<br />

science <strong>and</strong> web information management (e.g., Choi <strong>and</strong> Peng, 2004; Adami et al., 2005; Chen &<br />

Hsu, 2006), supplier clusters related to collaborative learning <strong>and</strong> risk management (Hallikas et al.,<br />

2005), marketing issues (e.g., Malhotra <strong>and</strong> Peterson, 2001; Tsai <strong>and</strong> Chiu, 2004), <strong>and</strong> others. Each<br />

of these cluster analyses requires a distinct determination of the clustering technique (i.e, choosing<br />

the most suitable algorithm such as single linkage (nearest neighbor), complete linkage (furthest<br />

neighbor), average (between groups) linkage, Ward’s method, or binary-positive approach) (Lorr,<br />

1983; Aldenderfer <strong>and</strong> Blashfield, 1984).<br />

We chose for the current study a clustering method characterized by the binary-positive approach,<br />

where the distance is defined by a positive attribute index based on the presence (1) or absence (0)<br />

of an attribute value for each case. The cluster dataset is a two dimensional matrix composed of<br />

cases on one axis <strong>and</strong> features on the other. The entries of the matrix are either ‘1’, if the case has<br />

the specific feature, or ‘0’, if the case lacks that feature. Based solely on the positive vector, two<br />

indexes are calculated: the Pair Similarity Index (PSI) that measures similarity between cases, <strong>and</strong><br />

the Group Similarity Index (GSI) that measures similarity within a group of cases (Gelbard <strong>and</strong><br />

Spiegler, 2000; Gelbard et al., 2007).<br />

In the research analysis of the political campaign, the entities for clustering were the individual eligible<br />

voters <strong>and</strong> the attributes were their various traits <strong>and</strong> characteristics including age, gender,<br />

neighborhood, profession, habits, etc, that qualified the clustering procedures. For each attribute we<br />

defined a set of possible values <strong>and</strong> every voter was either assigned to this sub-attribute or not. We<br />

started with the identification of clusters of voters based on geographic locations in order to create<br />

homogeneous groups of citizens that have similar local oriented interests. Other groups were<br />

clustered base on common demographics such as place of employment, similar professions, common<br />

religious preferences or an interest in sports. Another powerful method to identify homogenous<br />

groups of supporters is derived from analyzing historical voter behavioral trends which is part of the<br />

knowledge base that the information management professional bring to every campaign. The<br />

efficiency of the clustering that produces the profiles of the various groups depends heavily on the<br />

quality of the learning process that is responsible for building <strong>and</strong> updating the knowledge structure.<br />

There is a positive linear relationship between the effort assigned to the debriefing <strong>and</strong> archiving<br />

process of past occurrences <strong>and</strong> the value of their contribution to the development of a good<br />

mitigation plan to head off future similar events. Continuous learning is m<strong>and</strong>atory for constructing a<br />

solid process responsible for the transformation of information into knowledge, which in turn is further<br />

transformed into effective managerial tools. Voter segmentation is the basis of every successful<br />

political marketing campaign because the c<strong>and</strong>idate is not perceived equally by all voters (Newman,<br />

1994). Clustering <strong>and</strong> profiling voters into homogeneous groups enables the marketing professionals<br />

of the campaign to present a different aspect of the c<strong>and</strong>idate for the different groups of voters,<br />

hence, gaining a wider collection of supporters.<br />

The impact of poor quality data <strong>and</strong> a lack of a good structure of knowledge in any organization are<br />

manifested in increased cost, lower customer <strong>and</strong> employee satisfaction, <strong>and</strong> difficulties to set <strong>and</strong><br />

execute strategy (Redman, 1998). The impact of poor quality of data <strong>and</strong> a lack of a good structure of<br />

192

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!