27.06.2013 Views

Information and Knowledge Management using ArcGIS ModelBuilder

Information and Knowledge Management using ArcGIS ModelBuilder

Information and Knowledge Management using ArcGIS ModelBuilder

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Thanos Magoulas, Aida Hadzic, Ted Saarikko <strong>and</strong> Kalevi Pessi<br />

forms <strong>and</strong> aspects of architectural alignment treated by the investigated approaches to Enterprise<br />

Architecture?<br />

2. Research methodology<br />

The approaches addressed in this paper are the Zachman Framework (Zachman 1987, Sowa <strong>and</strong><br />

Zachman 1992), The Open Group Architecture Framework - TOGAF (TOGAF 2009), the Extended<br />

Enterprise Architecture Framework – E2AF (Schekkerman 2006:a, 2006:b, 2006:c) <strong>and</strong> the<br />

Generalised Enterprise Reference Architecture <strong>and</strong> Methodology - GERAM (Bernus <strong>and</strong> Nemes<br />

1994, GERAM 2003). The first <strong>and</strong> second of these frameworks were elected due to their popularity,<br />

E2AF due to its explicit focus on the extended enterprise <strong>and</strong> GERAM due to its focus on<br />

customization.<br />

The study at h<strong>and</strong> has been conducted <strong>using</strong> the best, first-h<strong>and</strong> literary sources available. It is<br />

however possible that some documentation regarding these approaches is unavailable due to for<br />

instance intellectual property or fragmented documentation.<br />

Given the inherent difficulties in the comparison this paper seeks to carry out, the most meaningful<br />

approach would be to apply the approaches to actual organizational needs <strong>and</strong> practices. Therefore,<br />

as a baseline for our evaluation, this comparison will utilize the MIT1990s framework for<br />

organizational research (Morton 1991). Furthermore, we will exp<strong>and</strong> upon this model <strong>using</strong> research<br />

by (Dahlbom 1996, Magoulas <strong>and</strong> Pessi, 1998, Spanos et al 2002).<br />

2.1 Research model<br />

Our research model defines the realized architecture of an enterprise in five basic areas of interests.<br />

They are: (1) the area of goals, objectives <strong>and</strong> values, (2) the area of enterprise activities <strong>and</strong> their<br />

management, (3) the area of decisional rights <strong>and</strong> responsibilities, (4) the area of primary<br />

stakeholders <strong>and</strong> lastly, (5) the area of information systems <strong>and</strong> the corresponding ICT. These<br />

resources together define the information infrastructure of the enterprise.<br />

Figure 1: Model for research<br />

From the perspective of alignment, information systems <strong>and</strong> <strong>Information</strong> <strong>and</strong> Communication<br />

Technology (ICT) forms a natural centre as this area permeates all aspects of the enterprise. While<br />

information systems today tend to be computerized, the essential feature is its emphasis on proper<br />

procedure (Putnam 1966). If collectively viewed, the architecture of information systems defines those<br />

systems that provide the enterprise with information <strong>and</strong> services. These may be transactional,<br />

322

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!