27.06.2013 Views

Information and Knowledge Management using ArcGIS ModelBuilder

Information and Knowledge Management using ArcGIS ModelBuilder

Information and Knowledge Management using ArcGIS ModelBuilder

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Bart-Jan van Putten, Franziska Brecht, <strong>and</strong> Oliver Günther<br />

dimension, which was therefore mainly used to provoke responses regarding which BCD tasks<br />

could/should be automated <strong>and</strong> which could/should not.<br />

For each topic, for each dimension, a statement was defined. E.g., for the topic <strong>Information</strong> Quality<br />

the statements were:<br />

“The quality of information in a business case should be clear.” (relevance dimension)<br />

“Determining the quality of information in a business case is a challenge.” (challenge dimension)<br />

“A BCF should support the determination of the quality of information.” (support dimension)<br />

The interviewees were asked to what extent they agreed with the statements. A five point Likert-scale<br />

ranging from -2 (‘strongly disagree’) to +2 (‘strongly agree’), including a ‘no opinion’ option was used.<br />

Table 1 shows the mean scores <strong>and</strong> st<strong>and</strong>ard deviations, all with a sample size of eight. Based on the<br />

mean scores, Figure 3 was drawn. Each dot represents one of the 15 topics. The size of the dot<br />

represents the relevance of the topic (note that the scores have been categorized so that there are<br />

only three different sizes, which makes it easier to see the difference in size). The vertical axis<br />

represents the challenge dimension. The challenging topics need to be understood better <strong>and</strong> thus<br />

require further investigation. The horizontal axis represents the support dimension. If BCF support is<br />

needed, supporting functionality should be implemented.<br />

Figure 3: The 15 topics structured along the three dimensions, based on the interviews<br />

Four topics, Market Potential Estimation (MPE), <strong>Information</strong> Quality (IQ), Clarifying Reasoning (CR)<br />

<strong>and</strong> Reuse of Structure (RS), fall in the highest relevance category. Three of them, MPE, IQ, CR, are<br />

both challenging <strong>and</strong> require BCF support according to the interviewees. One topic, RS, only requires<br />

BCF support but is not perceived as challenging. The remainder of this section will describe the<br />

results of the interviews regarding these four topics in more detail.<br />

Market Potential Estimation (MPE) is about estimating the sales <strong>and</strong> revenue potential for a certain<br />

product or service, offered to a specific market segment. MPE is an issue for companies who sell<br />

products or services <strong>and</strong> thus make ‘provider perspective BCs’. The interviewees strongly agreed with<br />

the relevance of the topic <strong>and</strong> stated that it can be very challenging unless you have a lot of<br />

experience in the respective market. They also strongly agreed with the need for BCF support for this<br />

challenge.<br />

<strong>Information</strong> Quality (IQ) is about making sure that BCs are reliable <strong>and</strong> have predictive value.<br />

Gathering reliable data can be hard, doing quantifications on that data can be hard, but also<br />

determining the quality of information provided by others can be hard, e.g., a precise number may<br />

give an accurate impression, but may be a rough estimate in reality. Interviewees agree with the<br />

relevance of the topic, agree with the challenges <strong>and</strong> agree with the need for BCF support.<br />

559

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!