27.06.2013 Views

Information and Knowledge Management using ArcGIS ModelBuilder

Information and Knowledge Management using ArcGIS ModelBuilder

Information and Knowledge Management using ArcGIS ModelBuilder

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Ghassan Kbar<br />

2. Partnership <strong>and</strong> VC project funding in KSA<br />

In order to identify the problems facing the technological entrepreneurship projects at KSA, a survey<br />

has been conducted through contacting companies' managers in Saudi Arabia as shown in Figure 1.<br />

According to this survey, the most critical obstacles facing the VC project funding are related to lack of<br />

skills (61%), education programs (54%), research capability (51%), <strong>and</strong> management (37%), which all<br />

contributes to lowering the trust among investors <strong>and</strong> funders. There are other obstacles associated<br />

with funding constraints that are caused by the lack of knowledge <strong>and</strong> good incentive program to<br />

attract partners through a fair partnership models. There are some other obstacles associated with<br />

acquiring knowledge, existing regulations <strong>and</strong> conf<strong>using</strong> procedures <strong>and</strong> company processes. These<br />

results give an indication to the main obstacles facing the development countries, where skills,<br />

experiences <strong>and</strong> knowledge are the main factors in slowing down the creation of knowledge based<br />

economy compared to the existence of funding. This will reduce the trust among VC organizations to<br />

involve in the partnership <strong>and</strong> to support the development of technological projects.<br />

Figure 1: Obstacles <strong>and</strong> difficulties facing technological entrepreneurship projects at KSA<br />

3. Fair partnership models<br />

Two categories of partnership models <strong>and</strong> fair methods for sharing the benefit of IP <strong>and</strong> the Return of<br />

Investment ROI are described in this section. These categories are based on development <strong>and</strong><br />

investment. In both partnership models, the following methodology describes how to reach a effective<br />

fair partnership. First, the involved parties have to be determined. Then, their direct <strong>and</strong> indirect<br />

contributions to the shared project would be identified, <strong>and</strong> finally the formulas that calculate the value<br />

of the project at a particular time <strong>and</strong> how profit or loss can be distributed fairly among partners need<br />

to be done. The partnership development model includes the following parties, the owner of the idea,<br />

the funding partner, <strong>and</strong> the operational partner. Up on completion of the development, these 3<br />

parties would share the value of IP that is based on the stage of innovation <strong>and</strong> partner’s<br />

contributions. Where there are 4 innovation stages which include novel idea, proof of concept,<br />

prototype, <strong>and</strong> advance prototype. The following presents the percentage contribution of each party,<br />

<strong>and</strong> the calculation of the development partnership model that is based on the bellow assumptions:<br />

D = Total expense of development (for the period of the projects)<br />

P = Partnership development contribution = D/X, where 1/X is the percentage of contribution<br />

K = Science Park development contribution = D(1 – 1/X)<br />

V = Value of IP<br />

Idea Owner share = O<br />

R = Residue of share = V – O<br />

Partner share of V = [(1/X)*100]% of R = y of R<br />

245

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!