27.06.2013 Views

Information and Knowledge Management using ArcGIS ModelBuilder

Information and Knowledge Management using ArcGIS ModelBuilder

Information and Knowledge Management using ArcGIS ModelBuilder

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Value of <strong>Knowledge</strong> <strong>Management</strong> Systems: A Review<br />

Paper<br />

Nelly Todorova<br />

University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zeal<strong>and</strong><br />

nelly.todorova@canterbury.ac.nz<br />

Abstract: One of the basic knowledge management questions is how organizations can turn the knowledge that<br />

they have into something that adds value. While there is general agreement on the importance of value creation<br />

through knowledge generation, diffusion <strong>and</strong> utilization, the concept of value in the context of knowledge<br />

management has not been defined. This fundamental issue is complicated by the different paradigms underlying<br />

KM such as information management, strategic management, business process re-engineering, philosophy <strong>and</strong><br />

economics. Defining value in the context of KM will lead to better underst<strong>and</strong>ing of the potential sources of value<br />

creation from knowledge management <strong>and</strong> better management of knowledge assets. It will inform the<br />

measurement of knowledge <strong>and</strong> its impacts on organizations. It will lead to recognition of the contribution of<br />

knowledge assets to organizational success. This paper provides a comprehensive literature review reporting on<br />

prior research on value creation <strong>and</strong> how this can improve the underst<strong>and</strong>ing of value in the context of knowledge<br />

management. The subject of value is very complex due to its subjective nature, multiple levels of sources <strong>and</strong><br />

users <strong>and</strong> a multitude of underpinning disciplines <strong>and</strong> perspectives. Current research has called for the need for<br />

integration of these perspectives <strong>and</strong> greater underst<strong>and</strong>ing of the value dimensions at different levels. This<br />

paper presents a preliminary holistic framework of value dimensions in order to gain better underst<strong>and</strong>ing of the<br />

value created from KM initiatives from multiple perspectives at organizational level. This framework can be used<br />

to map out specific value priorities for organizations <strong>and</strong> align them with measurements that are set for evaluation<br />

of KM initiatives.<br />

Keywords: knowledge management, evaluation, value creation, KM systems<br />

1. Introduction<br />

The 21st century is a knowledge economy <strong>and</strong> knowledge workers are the most valuable asset of<br />

organizations (Drucker, 2000). <strong>Knowledge</strong> is needed to deal with complexity, to provide value-added<br />

services <strong>and</strong> to encourage innovation. Achieving sustainable competitive advantage is only possible<br />

through what an organization knows, how it utilizes <strong>and</strong> how fast it can learn something new (Prusak,<br />

1997). <strong>Knowledge</strong> <strong>Management</strong> is an approach that was developed to leverage this new core<br />

resource. <strong>Knowledge</strong> management (KM) aims to help employees effectively create, share <strong>and</strong> utilize<br />

knowledge to enhance the organisation’s knowledge (Jashapara, 2004)<br />

To pursue this advantage companies have invested billions of dollars in knowledge management<br />

systems to facilitate the storage <strong>and</strong> flow of knowledge within the organization. However, it is not<br />

enough to generate knowledge <strong>and</strong> make it available. Many organizations which have invested in KM<br />

systems have realised that knowledge management is not a one-off investment but a continuous<br />

process (KPMG Survey, 2003). KM systems are often perceived as “glorified information systems” as<br />

there is a gap between their promise <strong>and</strong> what they deliver (Geisler, 2008 p 255). The important<br />

success factor is to provide knowledge which adds value. One of the primary questions for<br />

<strong>Knowledge</strong> <strong>Management</strong> researchers <strong>and</strong> practitioners is how organizations can transform the<br />

knowledge that they have into something that adds value.<br />

While there is general agreement on the importance of value creation through knowledge generation,<br />

diffusion <strong>and</strong> utilization, the concept of value in the context of knowledge management has not been<br />

defined. This fundamental issue is complicated by the different paradigms underlying KM such as<br />

information management, strategic management, business process re-engineering, philosophy <strong>and</strong><br />

economics. The concept of value generated from knowledge management varies dependent on the<br />

perspective. Defining value in the context of KM will lead to better underst<strong>and</strong>ing of the potential<br />

sources of value creation from knowledge management <strong>and</strong> to better management of knowledge<br />

assets. It will inform the measurement of knowledge <strong>and</strong> its impacts on organizations. It will improve<br />

to recognition of the contribution of knowledge assets to organizational success (Boudreau, 2003 p<br />

361). Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to investigate the sources of value creation at the<br />

organizational level <strong>and</strong> to improve our underst<strong>and</strong>ing of value in the context of knowledge<br />

management initiatives.<br />

475

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!