27.06.2013 Views

Information and Knowledge Management using ArcGIS ModelBuilder

Information and Knowledge Management using ArcGIS ModelBuilder

Information and Knowledge Management using ArcGIS ModelBuilder

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Dawit Asmelash<br />

Steps Output<br />

8<br />

9<br />

Benefits<br />

-Increase number of requests for research-based consultation<br />

-More research projects will proceed<br />

-More papers will be accepted in international accredited journals<br />

All positive outcomes relate to the IT impact on “Research” process.<br />

Monetary or equivalent substitutions gained from the positive outcomes listed in step<br />

8.<br />

4.2 Assessment IT benefits identification method<br />

From a research perspective, the emphasis <strong>and</strong> use of the business outcomes indicators <strong>and</strong> the<br />

adoption of this approach is high among the research participants. This shows signs of success in<br />

identifying <strong>and</strong> describing specific <strong>and</strong> accurate potential benefits. However, this is not a definitive<br />

assessment <strong>and</strong> this method should be exercised <strong>and</strong> tested by the general population that will be<br />

involved in the justification process in the organization. The research will seek to validate the method<br />

in the coming justification season. It has been possible to develop the following provisional list of<br />

findings with respect to this benefit identification approach:<br />

This method requires evaluators (business management) to have an adequate underst<strong>and</strong>ing of<br />

the concepts of IT benefits, but this can be achieved through introducing a learning session.<br />

This method keeps benefits firmly on the agenda, whereas most IT requests in the past used to<br />

focus on expressing the severity of their problem as a justification for discretionary IT<br />

investments.<br />

This method makes it easy for the evaluators to underst<strong>and</strong> the nature of their expectations<br />

(benefits) <strong>and</strong> to identify other possibilities that can be harnessed from IT.<br />

In the successive engagement, almost all participants managed to identify numerous possible<br />

benefits (positive outcome descriptions) that are specific <strong>and</strong> accurate (true) to the initiatives.<br />

4.2.1 Proposed model for benefit identification at ex-ante justification stage<br />

The identification method steps from 1 to 9 in section 4.1.1 covers the relationship between the<br />

business goal <strong>and</strong> outcome descriptions. If this method is applied properly, it can be expected to<br />

provide better benefit identification for evaluation at the ex-ante justification process. Taking into<br />

account the effectiveness of the method among the research participants, this research proposes the<br />

following model for the organization.<br />

The relationship between business goal, IT goal <strong>and</strong> outcome discussed in section 4.1 has been<br />

modified with the support of the empirical findings. At this stage, the “IT solution goal” specifies the<br />

means of achieving the business goal. In turn, the IT solution goal “outcome description” lists<br />

expected IT achievements that indicates how the IT goal is going to be achieved. The IT solution<br />

“outcome description” also indicates whether the business goal is likely to be achieved.<br />

Potential<br />

benefit<br />

Results<br />

Business<br />

Goal<br />

derive<br />

Outcome<br />

Description<br />

drives<br />

enables<br />

IT Solution<br />

Goal<br />

derive<br />

Outcome<br />

Descriptio<br />

Figure 3: Model of benefit identification at ex-ante stage (source: Author, 2011)<br />

72

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!