The book of Enoch : translated from Professor Dillmann's Ethiopic ...

320
The Book of Enoch.
of the Giz. MS., I stated shortly the relative positions and
values of the Eth. and Gk. texts. As all my subsequent study
has only served to confirm these, I will restate them with large
additions and supply confirmatory evidence where necessary.
The materials for the textual criticism of Enoch are drawn
from three versions or sources—I. Latin, II. Greek, III.
Ethiopic. As the first of these is of very minor importance,
we will indicate very briefly the contributions made by this
source to the restoration of the text, and pass on to the others.
I. The Latin documents are
iv Ezra [vi. 2] as contributing
to the restoration of . En. lx. 6 (see Crit. Note, p.
vii. 32 as contributing to
154).
the restoration of . . En. li. 1 (see Crit. Note, p.
Tertullian, Be Cultu Fern. i. 2 :
Metallorum opera nuda-
140).
verant En. viii. 1 (see Crit. Note, p.
66).
Be Idol, iv En. xcix. 7 (see Crit. Note,
Latin Fragment of Enoch cvi.
p. 285).
1-18 See, for full treatment, pp.
372-375-
II. S. Jude 14, 15 . . . . En. i. 9 (see Crit. Note, p.
Greek Fragment published from
3*7\
Vatican MS. by Mai . En. lxxxix. 42-49 (see pp.
238-240).
Fragments from Syncellus . . En. vi. i-x. 14
; xv. i-xvi. 1
(see pp. 62-75; s 3-$5)-
Gizeh MS En. i-xxxii. (see pp. 326-
37°\
III. The Ethiopic MSS. enumerated on p. 2, which are
fairly represented by Dln.'s Ethiopic text as corrected in my
Crit. Notes according to G or M or GM, &c. These corrections