02.07.2013 Views

The book of Enoch : translated from Professor Dillmann's Ethiopic ...

The book of Enoch : translated from Professor Dillmann's Ethiopic ...

The book of Enoch : translated from Professor Dillmann's Ethiopic ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

20<br />

<strong>The</strong> Book <strong>of</strong> <strong>Enoch</strong>.<br />

p raiseworthy attempt to popularise a knowledge <strong>of</strong> these<br />

works. <strong>The</strong> writer assigns the traditional ground-work to<br />

the years 153-130 B.C., and regards the Similitudes as written<br />

a few years later. Many <strong>of</strong> this writer's statements on the<br />

theology and influence <strong>of</strong> <strong>Enoch</strong> are to be taken with extreme<br />

caution.<br />

Thomson, Books that 'influenced our Lord and His Apostles,<br />

1 891, pp. 95, 103, 108, 225-248, 389-411. Mr. Thomson's<br />

analysis is as follows :<br />

(1) Book <strong>of</strong> the Similitudes and the Book <strong>of</strong> the Weeks,<br />

xxxvii-lxxi; xci. 12-xcix, written about the year 210 B.C.<br />

(2) Noachic Fragments, lx; lxv-lxix. 24.<br />

(3) Book <strong>of</strong> the Fall <strong>of</strong> the Angels and <strong>of</strong> the Luminaries,<br />

i-xxxvi; lxxii-xci. 11 ; c-cvii, written not later than 160 B.C.<br />

(4)<br />

cviii. Mr. Thomson's chief ground for regarding<br />

xxxvii-lxxi as the oldest section is derived <strong>from</strong> the presence<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Noachic interpolations. As he believes that these<br />

interpolations are confined to this section, he infers that<br />

xxxvii-lxxi is therefore the oldest and that i-xxxvi ;<br />

lxxii-xci<br />

were not yet in existence. Even if Mr. Thomson were right<br />

in his facts, quite another conclusion would be possible. But<br />

this writer's premises are without foundation. Interpolations<br />

are found in every section in <strong>Enoch</strong> and numerously in the<br />

sections which Mr. Thomson regards as free <strong>from</strong> them. It<br />

cannot be said that this <strong>book</strong> contributes much to the better<br />

interpretation <strong>of</strong> <strong>Enoch</strong>, and this is all the more to be deplored<br />

as its author obviously possesses abundant ability for the task.<br />

Cheyne, Origin <strong>of</strong> the Psalter, 1891, pp. 22, 375, 412-<br />

414, 423-424, 448-449, and about fifty references besides.<br />

' Possible Zoroastrian Influences on the Religion <strong>of</strong> Israel/<br />

Expository Times, 1891, p. 207. Dr. Cheyne accepts pro-<br />

visionally the traditional division <strong>of</strong> <strong>Enoch</strong> into the ground-<br />

work, Similitudes and Noachic fragments, and regards the<br />

Similitudes as pre-Christian. He deals mainly with the<br />

dogmatic teaching <strong>of</strong> the <strong>book</strong> and its place in the develop-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!