24.12.2014 Views

AIB 2012 Conference Proceedings - Academy of International ...

AIB 2012 Conference Proceedings - Academy of International ...

AIB 2012 Conference Proceedings - Academy of International ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

SUNDAY<br />

Corpus Linguistics Tools and Qualitative and Quantitative <strong>International</strong> Business Research<br />

Brian Hilton, Nottingham University Business School<br />

John McKenny, English Studies Nottingham University<br />

This interdisciplinary paper sets out to explore the use <strong>of</strong> a Corpus Linguistic tool as a means either to<br />

quantitatively test hypothesis about the development <strong>of</strong> ideas in <strong>International</strong> Business or to qualitatively<br />

ground theory on developing perceptions within the genre. In illustration <strong>of</strong> the former it tests the hypothesis<br />

that the Integration Responsiveness framework has become paradigmaticly embodied in the genre. In<br />

illustration <strong>of</strong> the latter it shows how the descriptive material this tool lays out can be used to raise questions<br />

for qualitative exploration as potential new or developing ideas within the body <strong>of</strong> scholarship represented by<br />

articles in JIBS (For more information, please contact: Brian Hilton, Nottingham University Business School,<br />

China: brian.hilton@nottingham.edu.cn)<br />

By Eyesight - A Case <strong>of</strong> Mixing Methods in Qualitative Business Research<br />

Sabina Jaeger, AUT University<br />

Romuald Rudzki, New Zealand School <strong>of</strong> Export<br />

The paper tells the story <strong>of</strong> a research process, a project with the aim to investigate critical export barriers to<br />

growth. Starting <strong>of</strong>f with a quantitative method in the form <strong>of</strong> a mail survey the necessity for employing further<br />

investigative tools became quickly obvious. Ambiguous survey replies such as "by eyesight" demanded more indepth<br />

investigation in order to understand the meaning <strong>of</strong> the data collected. Applying different techniques <strong>of</strong><br />

data collection achieved the goal to comprehend what the respondents perceived as critical barriers and what<br />

made them decide to export in spite <strong>of</strong> sometimes adverse conditions. It appeared that the reality and extent <strong>of</strong><br />

the barriers were conditional on the respondents' perception <strong>of</strong>, and attitude towards, the barriers. In<br />

conclusion a mixed method research approach (triangulation) provided superior insights into the complexities <strong>of</strong><br />

making the decision for or against export activity than a survey alone. (For more information, please contact:<br />

Sabina Jaeger, AUT University, New Zealand: sabina.jaeger@aut.ac.nz)<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 100

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!