24.12.2014 Views

AIB 2012 Conference Proceedings - Academy of International ...

AIB 2012 Conference Proceedings - Academy of International ...

AIB 2012 Conference Proceedings - Academy of International ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

MONDAY<br />

This paper examines the relationship between board structure and risk taking behavior <strong>of</strong> emerging market<br />

firms by looking at firms' growth strategies. I investigate two types <strong>of</strong> growth strategies – growth through<br />

international expansion, and growth through new domestic ventures. More specifically, I study the individual<br />

and joint effects <strong>of</strong> board structure, network centrality through board interlocks and ownership structure on<br />

firm's growth strategies. Using longitudinal data on 2152 publicly listed Indian firms from 2002 to 2009, I find<br />

that boards that are structured keeping in view the resource dependence role are more helpful in pursuing<br />

growth strategies. (For more information, please contact: Deeksha A. Singh, Temple University, USA:<br />

deeksha@temple.edu)<br />

The Shareholder Value Creation Effects <strong>of</strong> Corporate Governance on the <strong>International</strong>isation <strong>of</strong> Emerging Market<br />

Firms<br />

Lutao Ning, Durham University<br />

Roger Strange, University <strong>of</strong> Sussex<br />

Jing-Ming Kou, Durham University<br />

The rapid international expansion <strong>of</strong> firms from emerging economies has caught media attention worldwide and<br />

attracted considerable academic interests over the last decade. Previous research has emphasised emerging<br />

market firms' motivations and strategies for internationalisation. Understanding <strong>of</strong> whether their<br />

internationalisation through cross-border mergers and acquisitions (CM&As) has created value for shareholders<br />

is still relatively limited. There is also little empirical evidence on the value implications <strong>of</strong> good corporate<br />

governance for emerging market CM&As. Using a unique and manually collected firm-level dataset, this paper<br />

examines the stock returns upon CM&A announcements made by Chinese multinationals listed in the Hong<br />

Kong Stock Exchange from 1991 to 2011, where firms are subjected to stricter international reporting rules and<br />

accounting standards. The empirical findings support our hypotheses that CM&As by EMNEs create shareholder<br />

value. We also found that the magnitude <strong>of</strong> created value is positively associated with the effectiveness <strong>of</strong><br />

corporate governance, which mainly stems from moderation <strong>of</strong> principal-principal rather than principal-agent<br />

conflicts as perceived by international investors. (For more information, please contact: Lutao Ning, Durham<br />

University, United Kingdom: lutao.ning@durham.ac.uk)<br />

Returnee Managers and <strong>International</strong>ization <strong>of</strong> Emerging Economy Firms: The Moderating Role <strong>of</strong> Corporate<br />

Govenance<br />

Lin Cui, Australian National University<br />

Yi Li, Australian National University<br />

Zijie Li, University <strong>of</strong> <strong>International</strong> Business and Economics<br />

Emerging economy (EE) firms recruit returnee managers with international experience to support their growth<br />

into the global market. This study investigates the effect <strong>of</strong> returnee managers on EE firms' foreign direct<br />

investment (FDI) decisions. Drawing on upper-echelon perspective and the principal-principal conflict<br />

perspective in the corporate governance <strong>of</strong> EE firms, we argue that the returnee managers have a positive<br />

effect on EE firms' FDI propensity, while this effect is moderated in opposite manners by shareholders who have<br />

conflicts in interests, in particular, the dominant state owner and the influential foreign owner. Our empirical<br />

results from an event history analysis <strong>of</strong> 164 Chinese listed firms over an 8-year period supported the<br />

hypothesized main effect, and the negative moderating role <strong>of</strong> foreign ownership. (For more information, please<br />

contact: Lin Cui, Australian National University, Australia: lin.cui@anu.edu.au)<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 167

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!