AIB 2012 Conference Proceedings - Academy of International ...
AIB 2012 Conference Proceedings - Academy of International ...
AIB 2012 Conference Proceedings - Academy of International ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
MONDAY<br />
This paper examines the relationship between board structure and risk taking behavior <strong>of</strong> emerging market<br />
firms by looking at firms' growth strategies. I investigate two types <strong>of</strong> growth strategies – growth through<br />
international expansion, and growth through new domestic ventures. More specifically, I study the individual<br />
and joint effects <strong>of</strong> board structure, network centrality through board interlocks and ownership structure on<br />
firm's growth strategies. Using longitudinal data on 2152 publicly listed Indian firms from 2002 to 2009, I find<br />
that boards that are structured keeping in view the resource dependence role are more helpful in pursuing<br />
growth strategies. (For more information, please contact: Deeksha A. Singh, Temple University, USA:<br />
deeksha@temple.edu)<br />
The Shareholder Value Creation Effects <strong>of</strong> Corporate Governance on the <strong>International</strong>isation <strong>of</strong> Emerging Market<br />
Firms<br />
Lutao Ning, Durham University<br />
Roger Strange, University <strong>of</strong> Sussex<br />
Jing-Ming Kou, Durham University<br />
The rapid international expansion <strong>of</strong> firms from emerging economies has caught media attention worldwide and<br />
attracted considerable academic interests over the last decade. Previous research has emphasised emerging<br />
market firms' motivations and strategies for internationalisation. Understanding <strong>of</strong> whether their<br />
internationalisation through cross-border mergers and acquisitions (CM&As) has created value for shareholders<br />
is still relatively limited. There is also little empirical evidence on the value implications <strong>of</strong> good corporate<br />
governance for emerging market CM&As. Using a unique and manually collected firm-level dataset, this paper<br />
examines the stock returns upon CM&A announcements made by Chinese multinationals listed in the Hong<br />
Kong Stock Exchange from 1991 to 2011, where firms are subjected to stricter international reporting rules and<br />
accounting standards. The empirical findings support our hypotheses that CM&As by EMNEs create shareholder<br />
value. We also found that the magnitude <strong>of</strong> created value is positively associated with the effectiveness <strong>of</strong><br />
corporate governance, which mainly stems from moderation <strong>of</strong> principal-principal rather than principal-agent<br />
conflicts as perceived by international investors. (For more information, please contact: Lutao Ning, Durham<br />
University, United Kingdom: lutao.ning@durham.ac.uk)<br />
Returnee Managers and <strong>International</strong>ization <strong>of</strong> Emerging Economy Firms: The Moderating Role <strong>of</strong> Corporate<br />
Govenance<br />
Lin Cui, Australian National University<br />
Yi Li, Australian National University<br />
Zijie Li, University <strong>of</strong> <strong>International</strong> Business and Economics<br />
Emerging economy (EE) firms recruit returnee managers with international experience to support their growth<br />
into the global market. This study investigates the effect <strong>of</strong> returnee managers on EE firms' foreign direct<br />
investment (FDI) decisions. Drawing on upper-echelon perspective and the principal-principal conflict<br />
perspective in the corporate governance <strong>of</strong> EE firms, we argue that the returnee managers have a positive<br />
effect on EE firms' FDI propensity, while this effect is moderated in opposite manners by shareholders who have<br />
conflicts in interests, in particular, the dominant state owner and the influential foreign owner. Our empirical<br />
results from an event history analysis <strong>of</strong> 164 Chinese listed firms over an 8-year period supported the<br />
hypothesized main effect, and the negative moderating role <strong>of</strong> foreign ownership. (For more information, please<br />
contact: Lin Cui, Australian National University, Australia: lin.cui@anu.edu.au)<br />
<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />
Page 167