24.12.2014 Views

AIB 2012 Conference Proceedings - Academy of International ...

AIB 2012 Conference Proceedings - Academy of International ...

AIB 2012 Conference Proceedings - Academy of International ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

SUNDAY<br />

Session: 1.4.7 - Competitive<br />

Track: 4 - Strategy, Alliances, and Competitiveness<br />

Trust and Information Asymmetry in <strong>International</strong> Alliances<br />

Presented On: July 1, <strong>2012</strong> - 14:30-15:45<br />

Chair: Ilya Cuypers, Singapore Management University<br />

Information Asymmetry and Partner Selection in <strong>International</strong> Alliances<br />

Amol M. Joshi, University <strong>of</strong> Hawaii at Manoa<br />

Nandini Lahiri, University <strong>of</strong> North Carolina at Chapel Hill<br />

We extend prior research on intra-firm language barriers by investigating inter-firm language barriers in crossborder<br />

alliances. Integrating concepts from sociolinguistics and information economics, we posit that language<br />

barriers between potential partners exacerbate information asymmetries, while market signals <strong>of</strong> the<br />

commercial value <strong>of</strong> a partner's knowledge counteract these asymmetries. To test these ideas, we quantify<br />

language barriers using a distance measure <strong>of</strong> linguistic differences and we analyze data on semiconductor<br />

alliances during 1988-2001. Controlling for cultural, geographical, and technological distances, our empirical<br />

results suggest that firms overcome large language distances by relying on market signals <strong>of</strong> a prospective<br />

partner's level <strong>of</strong> disclosure, stock <strong>of</strong> knowledge, and degree <strong>of</strong> specialization. Stronger signals significantly<br />

dampen the negative impact <strong>of</strong> language distance on the chances <strong>of</strong> forming an alliance. (For more information,<br />

please contact: Amol M. Joshi, University <strong>of</strong> Hawaii at Manoa, USA: amol@hawaii.edu)<br />

Home Country Effects on Trust in <strong>International</strong> Joint Ventures<br />

Gokhan Ertug, Singapore Management University<br />

Ilya Cuypers, Singapore Management University<br />

Niels Noorderhaven, Tilburg University<br />

Ben Bensaou, INSEAD<br />

Trust is an important factor in interfirm relations. Interorganizational trust in cross-border relationships is likely<br />

to be influenced by both home and host country factors. Using data on 165 international IJVs, we show that the<br />

trust expressed in the other IJV parent company is influenced by the general propensity to trust in the focal<br />

firm's home country. Moreover, trustors also differentiate between the home countries <strong>of</strong> the partner parent<br />

firm. This second effect is mitigated by experience between the partners. (For more information, please contact:<br />

Gokhan Ertug, Singapore Management University, Singapore: gokhanertug@smu.edu.sg)<br />

Coping with Low Trustworthiness in <strong>International</strong> Joint Ventures: The Moderating Effect <strong>of</strong> Performance<br />

Satisfaction<br />

Linda Hy Hsieh, University <strong>of</strong> Birmingham<br />

Suzana Braga Rodrigues, Erasmus University<br />

This paper contributes to the ongoing scholarly debate on the links between trust, performance satisfaction and<br />

governance. It draws upon the multi-method analysis <strong>of</strong> a survey <strong>of</strong> 71 international joint ventures (IJVs) and 4<br />

case studies <strong>of</strong> IJVs in Taiwan. The survey results show that the relationship between trust and ex post<br />

governance is moderated by performance satisfaction. The case studies corroborate and enrich the survey<br />

findings by illustrating that the trust-governance nexus is more complex than previous research has indicated.<br />

Low trustworthiness may not necessarily lead to the extensive application <strong>of</strong> ex post governance. The cases<br />

suggest that the decision to revise governance, through the intensification <strong>of</strong> existing controls or the devising <strong>of</strong><br />

new ones, is primarily taken under conditions <strong>of</strong> performance dissatisfaction. When low trust is combined with<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 62

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!