AIB 2012 Conference Proceedings - Academy of International ...
AIB 2012 Conference Proceedings - Academy of International ...
AIB 2012 Conference Proceedings - Academy of International ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
SUNDAY<br />
Session: 1.4.7 - Competitive<br />
Track: 4 - Strategy, Alliances, and Competitiveness<br />
Trust and Information Asymmetry in <strong>International</strong> Alliances<br />
Presented On: July 1, <strong>2012</strong> - 14:30-15:45<br />
Chair: Ilya Cuypers, Singapore Management University<br />
Information Asymmetry and Partner Selection in <strong>International</strong> Alliances<br />
Amol M. Joshi, University <strong>of</strong> Hawaii at Manoa<br />
Nandini Lahiri, University <strong>of</strong> North Carolina at Chapel Hill<br />
We extend prior research on intra-firm language barriers by investigating inter-firm language barriers in crossborder<br />
alliances. Integrating concepts from sociolinguistics and information economics, we posit that language<br />
barriers between potential partners exacerbate information asymmetries, while market signals <strong>of</strong> the<br />
commercial value <strong>of</strong> a partner's knowledge counteract these asymmetries. To test these ideas, we quantify<br />
language barriers using a distance measure <strong>of</strong> linguistic differences and we analyze data on semiconductor<br />
alliances during 1988-2001. Controlling for cultural, geographical, and technological distances, our empirical<br />
results suggest that firms overcome large language distances by relying on market signals <strong>of</strong> a prospective<br />
partner's level <strong>of</strong> disclosure, stock <strong>of</strong> knowledge, and degree <strong>of</strong> specialization. Stronger signals significantly<br />
dampen the negative impact <strong>of</strong> language distance on the chances <strong>of</strong> forming an alliance. (For more information,<br />
please contact: Amol M. Joshi, University <strong>of</strong> Hawaii at Manoa, USA: amol@hawaii.edu)<br />
Home Country Effects on Trust in <strong>International</strong> Joint Ventures<br />
Gokhan Ertug, Singapore Management University<br />
Ilya Cuypers, Singapore Management University<br />
Niels Noorderhaven, Tilburg University<br />
Ben Bensaou, INSEAD<br />
Trust is an important factor in interfirm relations. Interorganizational trust in cross-border relationships is likely<br />
to be influenced by both home and host country factors. Using data on 165 international IJVs, we show that the<br />
trust expressed in the other IJV parent company is influenced by the general propensity to trust in the focal<br />
firm's home country. Moreover, trustors also differentiate between the home countries <strong>of</strong> the partner parent<br />
firm. This second effect is mitigated by experience between the partners. (For more information, please contact:<br />
Gokhan Ertug, Singapore Management University, Singapore: gokhanertug@smu.edu.sg)<br />
Coping with Low Trustworthiness in <strong>International</strong> Joint Ventures: The Moderating Effect <strong>of</strong> Performance<br />
Satisfaction<br />
Linda Hy Hsieh, University <strong>of</strong> Birmingham<br />
Suzana Braga Rodrigues, Erasmus University<br />
This paper contributes to the ongoing scholarly debate on the links between trust, performance satisfaction and<br />
governance. It draws upon the multi-method analysis <strong>of</strong> a survey <strong>of</strong> 71 international joint ventures (IJVs) and 4<br />
case studies <strong>of</strong> IJVs in Taiwan. The survey results show that the relationship between trust and ex post<br />
governance is moderated by performance satisfaction. The case studies corroborate and enrich the survey<br />
findings by illustrating that the trust-governance nexus is more complex than previous research has indicated.<br />
Low trustworthiness may not necessarily lead to the extensive application <strong>of</strong> ex post governance. The cases<br />
suggest that the decision to revise governance, through the intensification <strong>of</strong> existing controls or the devising <strong>of</strong><br />
new ones, is primarily taken under conditions <strong>of</strong> performance dissatisfaction. When low trust is combined with<br />
<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />
Page 62