AIB 2012 Conference Proceedings - Academy of International ...
AIB 2012 Conference Proceedings - Academy of International ...
AIB 2012 Conference Proceedings - Academy of International ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
SUNDAY<br />
The following discussion promotes an Inclusive Economic Ecology perspective for poverty alleviation. The<br />
symbiotic relationship between inclusive markets and inclusive businesses is the center for the Inclusive<br />
Economic Ecology perspective. This view employs public policy and firm level poverty alleviation strategies to<br />
create an ecosystem that supports poverty mitigation and economic growth. The promotion and support <strong>of</strong><br />
inclusive markets in the Base <strong>of</strong> the Pyramid is a significant public policy agenda, although dependent on<br />
working with businesses that engage in inclusive practices. Public policy cannot independently create economic<br />
activity, however, it facilitates contexts (e.g., by supplying the legal frameworks that lend stability, fairness, and<br />
transparency to enterprise) that support inclusive business initiatives incorporating local producers and<br />
providers into their value chains. (For more information, please contact: Raed Elaydi, Roosevelt University, USA:<br />
relaydi@roosevelt.edu)<br />
Session: 1.4.P - Panel<br />
Track: 1 - Institutions, Governance, and CSR<br />
Showcase Panel on Managing the Shifting Public-Private Boundary in an Institutionally<br />
Heterogeneous World<br />
Presented On: July 1, <strong>2012</strong> - 14:30-15:45<br />
Chair: Bennet A. Zelner, University <strong>of</strong> Maryland, College Park<br />
Panelists:<br />
Bennet A. Zelner, University <strong>of</strong> Maryland, College Park<br />
Anita McGahan, University <strong>of</strong> Toronto<br />
Christos Pitelis, University <strong>of</strong> Cambridge<br />
Paul Vaaler, University <strong>of</strong> Minnesota<br />
Andrew Spicer, University <strong>of</strong> South Carolina<br />
Sandro Cabral, Universidade Federal da Bahia<br />
Since the dawn <strong>of</strong> the capitalist era, beliefs and policies about the appropriate roles and responsibilities <strong>of</strong> public<br />
and private sector actors have fluctuated significantly. The laissez-faire ideals prominent before the Great<br />
Depression <strong>of</strong> the 1930s subsequently gave way to Keynesianism and other forms <strong>of</strong> interventionist economic<br />
policy. By the late 1970s, the pendulum had swung back in the other direction as influential actors promoted<br />
neoliberal ideals—policymaking principles celebrating market mechanisms as a response to the perceived<br />
failings <strong>of</strong> the state-centered model—that fostered the adoption <strong>of</strong> market-oriented policy reforms in numerous<br />
countries around the world. Another shift now appears afoot. Advocates <strong>of</strong> both public and private sector<br />
solutions to the most pressing strategic issues <strong>of</strong> our time recognize the inevitable interplay between public and<br />
private organizations in creating, allocating, and stewarding resources. In some instances, public and private<br />
sector actors have adopted roles and responsibilities that depart from existing norms. More generally, the global<br />
financial crisis has instigated intense public debate about a range <strong>of</strong> issues—financial regulation, executive<br />
compensation, government assistance to the banking sector—that revolve around the appropriate roles and<br />
responsibilities <strong>of</strong> public and private sector actors. In the this panel discussion, prominent scholars from the<br />
fields <strong>of</strong> <strong>International</strong> Business and Strategic Management will consider the implications <strong>of</strong> the shifting<br />
public/private boundary for business strategy and public policy. What opportunities do public and private sector<br />
actors perceive or create in the face <strong>of</strong> such major institutional change What sorts <strong>of</strong> challenges do they<br />
overcome, and how More generally, what are the relative abilities—and disabilities—<strong>of</strong> public and private<br />
sector organizations in generating, deploying, and stewarding different types <strong>of</strong> productive resources (For<br />
more information, please contact: Bennet A. Zelner, University <strong>of</strong> Maryland, College Park, USA:<br />
bzelner@rhsmith.umd.edu)<br />
<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />
Page 55