24.12.2014 Views

AIB 2012 Conference Proceedings - Academy of International ...

AIB 2012 Conference Proceedings - Academy of International ...

AIB 2012 Conference Proceedings - Academy of International ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

SUNDAY<br />

In this paper, we investigate the evolution <strong>of</strong> MNC subsidiaries through development <strong>of</strong> innovation networks.<br />

Literature on innovation networks has seen them to develop in several different settings. These networks,<br />

during their evolution, span firm boundaries and geographic proximity. However, the evolution <strong>of</strong> innovation<br />

networks within and outside MNC subsidiaries has not been investigated from the perspective <strong>of</strong> these two<br />

dimensions: geographical and organizational distance. In order to find out a pattern, we chose the Information<br />

Technology cluster in Bangalore, India, where we find there are MNC subsidiaries that operate and innovate<br />

within and outside organizations, and have strong links with firms within and outside <strong>of</strong> Bangalore cluster. The<br />

globalized nature <strong>of</strong> the cluster helps us infer the evolution <strong>of</strong> innovation networks that takes place across fourphases.<br />

We further find that the innovation networks <strong>of</strong> these MNC subsidiaries first develop as withinorganization<br />

networks and then extend across organizations. Within the first part, the networks start with a<br />

non-local nature (phase-1) and develop into local networks (phase-2). However, within the latter part <strong>of</strong> the<br />

evolution, networks develop from local (phase-3) towards a non-local nature (phase-4). (For more information,<br />

please contact: Amit Karna, EBS Business School, Germany: amit.karna@ebs.edu)<br />

A Study on the Key Factors for Successful Implementation <strong>of</strong> Knowledge Management Systems <strong>of</strong> Multinational<br />

Corporations<br />

Chia Chen Hsu, Ting Hisin <strong>International</strong> Group<br />

Ying Sheng Yao , National Chi Nan University<br />

Tsai Chiao Wang, National Chi Nan University<br />

The purpose <strong>of</strong> this study was to explore the current status and development trend <strong>of</strong> knowledge management<br />

system implementation in subsidiaries <strong>of</strong> multinational corporations in Taiwan and find out the key factors <strong>of</strong><br />

successful implementation by conducting factor analyses. In addition, important issues were prioritized, so that<br />

managers can, with limited resources, effectively arrange their resources and schedules to increase chances <strong>of</strong><br />

successfully implementing knowledge management systems. The findings <strong>of</strong> this study include: 1.Subsidiaries<br />

should be highly cooperative in knowledge management system transfers. 2.High-level managers should be<br />

involved personally and support implementation. 3.A good IT foundation is required. 4.A taskforce should be<br />

formed to step-by-step create all knowledge tools and define evaluation indexes. 5.The core <strong>of</strong> knowledge<br />

management is employees. 6.Parent companies <strong>of</strong> multinational corporations should pay more attention to<br />

accumulated knowledge resources in their subsidiaries. 7.Subsidiaries should speed up their processes <strong>of</strong><br />

implementing knowledge management systems. (For more information, please contact: Chia Chen Hsu, Ting<br />

Hisin <strong>International</strong> Group, Taiwan: michelle_hsu@weichuan.com.tw)<br />

A Behavioral View on Coopetition and Knowledge Sharing Dynamics in Multinational Corporations<br />

Barbara Brenner, WU Wien<br />

Shalini Rogbeer , WU Wien<br />

Building on the unique bridging position <strong>of</strong> the Multinational Corporation (MNC) in accessing, sharing and<br />

(re)combining globally scattered knowledge, we suggest that intra-organizational networks evolve in a dynamic<br />

pattern <strong>of</strong> competition and cooperation depending on knowledge convergence. We use a case method to<br />

identify different drivers <strong>of</strong> intra-organizational knowledge flows. Drawing on behavioral theory we analyze<br />

under which conditions subsidiaries start and stop knowledge sharing and how convergence and coopetition<br />

affects network evolution in MNCs. Understanding these internal mechanisms is not only important for theory<br />

advancement but also has important practical managerial implications and allows us to gain novel insights into<br />

the dynamics <strong>of</strong> network evolution. Furthermore, our findings have concrete managerial implications for MNC<br />

managers acting on subsidiary coopetition and firm innovativeness. (For more information, please contact:<br />

Barbara Brenner, WU Wien, Austria: barbara.brenner@wu.ac.at)<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 91

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!