24.12.2014 Views

AIB 2012 Conference Proceedings - Academy of International ...

AIB 2012 Conference Proceedings - Academy of International ...

AIB 2012 Conference Proceedings - Academy of International ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

MONDAY<br />

The Relationship between Individual Cultural Values (ICV) and Nation Brand Personality (NBP) Traits<br />

José I. Rojas-Méndez, Carleton University<br />

Mohammed Alwan, Carleton University<br />

Nicolas Papadopoulos, Carleton University<br />

This is the first study exploring the relationship between Individual Cultural Values (ICV) and nation brand<br />

personality (NBP) traits. A survey was conducted among Saudi Arabia citizens, living in Saudi Arabia, regarding<br />

their perceptions <strong>of</strong> the personality projected by the U.S. brand. Results show a critical view by the Saudis<br />

because some negative brand personality traits (i.e. materialistic, egocentric, and authoritarian) rank at the top<br />

<strong>of</strong> their evaluations. Collectivism emerges as the most related ICV with NBP traits. This study confirms some<br />

relationships accepted in the personality psychology field between the Big-five and cultural dimensions, and at<br />

the same time proposes new such as masculinity with extraversion and conscientiousness, and collectivism with<br />

agreeableness and conscientiousness (all negative). Implications, limitations, and further research ideas are<br />

also presented. (For more information, please contact: José I. Rojas-Méndez, Carleton University, Canada:<br />

jose_rojas@carleton.ca)<br />

Impact <strong>of</strong> National Culture on Organizational Culture: A Comparative Analysis <strong>of</strong> the Implementation <strong>of</strong> Market<br />

Orientation across Nations<br />

Ahmet H. Kirca, Michigan State University<br />

This study tests the effects <strong>of</strong> national cultural values on organizational cultures with a comparative metaanalysis<br />

<strong>of</strong> the studies that investigate the implementation <strong>of</strong> market orientation across nations. The findings<br />

indicate that the <strong>of</strong>ten-cited effects <strong>of</strong> senior management factors (e.g., top management emphasis),<br />

interdepartmental dynamics (e.g., interdepartmental conflict), and organizational systems (e.g., centralization,<br />

formalization, reward systems) on market orientation are context dependent and the implementation <strong>of</strong> market<br />

orientation across nations is a function <strong>of</strong> the national cultural environment in which firms operate. As such, the<br />

present study provides useful insights for researchers and managers regarding the challenges that companies<br />

face when implementing market orientation in diverse country markets. (For more information, please contact:<br />

Ahmet H. Kirca, Michigan State University, USA: kirca@msu.edu)<br />

The Biasing Effects <strong>of</strong> Country-<strong>of</strong>-Origin: A cross-cultural Application <strong>of</strong> Preference Reversals<br />

Stephen Gould, Baruch College, CUNY<br />

Mike Chen-ho Chao, Baruch College, CUNY<br />

Andreas Grein, Baruch College, CUNY<br />

Rania Semaan, Baruch College, CUNY<br />

Country-<strong>of</strong>-origin (COO) effects on product evaluations have been widely applied in international marketing,<br />

albeit with mixed results and suggesting that how COO is framed is a factor in its relative impact. We apply one<br />

such framing perspective based on preference reversals and their biasing effects to a study <strong>of</strong> COO and<br />

willingness to pay (WTP) for a cellphone in the U.S., China and Taiwan. Similar results are mirrored across all<br />

three countries except for the separate condition in Taiwan where the U.S. COO image is relatively respected.<br />

When evaluated separately, consumers are willing to pay more for a domestic-made cellphone than a foreignmade<br />

one even though the former is not as good as the latter on an important attribute, amount <strong>of</strong> internal<br />

memory. However, when the domestic and foreign-made phones are presented in joint evaluations, the better<br />

foreign-made product is favored. Possible explanations and implications are <strong>of</strong>fered. (For more information,<br />

please contact: Mike Chen-ho Chao, Baruch College, CUNY, USA: chen-ho.chao@baruch.cuny.edu)<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 146

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!