24.12.2014 Views

AIB 2012 Conference Proceedings - Academy of International ...

AIB 2012 Conference Proceedings - Academy of International ...

AIB 2012 Conference Proceedings - Academy of International ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

SUNDAY<br />

Panelists:<br />

Toshiya Ozaki, Rikkyo University<br />

Tazeeb Rajwani, Cranfield University<br />

Thomas Lawton, EMLYON Business School<br />

Chengang Wang, Bradford University<br />

Fernando Fastoso, Bradford University<br />

George O. White III, Old Dominion University<br />

Adrian Kay, Australian National University<br />

Robert Ackrill, Nottingham Trent University<br />

Johan Lindeque, Amsterdam Business School<br />

Stephen Kobrin, University <strong>of</strong> Pennsylvania<br />

This panel explores both the current state <strong>of</strong> corporate political activity in sustaining, upgrading and utilizing <strong>of</strong><br />

international market institutions, and the theoretical frameworks that account for such non-market strategy.<br />

The business community, especially <strong>of</strong> the US but also <strong>of</strong> major developed economies, played an important role<br />

in helping policy makers to design and develop the postwar international economic system. This liberalized<br />

international system, in turn, has led to internal adaptations in the political economy <strong>of</strong> emerging markets.<br />

These market institutions, however, increasingly show strains. How are firms <strong>of</strong> the early 21st century<br />

anticipating the growing challenges <strong>of</strong> growing void in international economic governance Who are main<br />

corporate players, what are their interests, and what kinds <strong>of</strong> strategies are they pursuing In what ways, do<br />

the current institutions influence the behavior <strong>of</strong> MNEs and, in turn, how do these firms engage with<br />

governments in shaping the institutional environment <strong>of</strong> the early 21st century And what theoretical<br />

frameworks best analyze non-market strategy that account for their responses to institutional challenges The<br />

panel should provide a one stop shop to cover these timely and critical questions surrounding the sustainability<br />

<strong>of</strong> international business in the 21st century. (For more information, please contact: Toshiya Ozaki, Rikkyo<br />

University, Japan: ozakit@rikkyo.ac.jp)<br />

Session: 1.5.4 - Competitive<br />

Track: 12 - Value Creation and Work<br />

Reconfiguring the Value Chain: Offshoring<br />

Presented On: July 1, <strong>2012</strong> - 16:15-17:30<br />

Chair: Anna Dubiel, WHU<br />

The Impact <strong>of</strong> Location Choice and Governance Model on the Offshoring Performance<br />

Lucia Piscitello, Politecnico di Milano<br />

Stefano Elia, Politecnico di Milano<br />

Davide Luzzini, Politecnico di Milano<br />

Federico Caniato, Politecnico di Milano<br />

Stefano Ronchi, Politecnico di Milano<br />

The present paper deals with the performance implications <strong>of</strong> the <strong>of</strong>fshoring <strong>of</strong> service activities. Offshoring is<br />

intended as delocalization <strong>of</strong> business services in foreign countries that may occur either through a whollyowned<br />

company (Captive Offshoring) or by outsourcing the service activity (Offshore Outsourcing). We<br />

investigate the relationship between distinctive location specific characteristics <strong>of</strong> the host countries (cost <strong>of</strong><br />

labor, resource availability, cultural proximity, and the presence <strong>of</strong> local interests) and performance <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>of</strong>fshoring firm. We extend the literature by investigating both the direct effect <strong>of</strong> the governance model and its<br />

moderating role <strong>of</strong> the locations specific characteristics on performance. Our results show that the direct effect<br />

arises only when considering operational performance, while the moderating effect is more specific <strong>of</strong> strategic<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 80

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!