24.12.2014 Views

AIB 2012 Conference Proceedings - Academy of International ...

AIB 2012 Conference Proceedings - Academy of International ...

AIB 2012 Conference Proceedings - Academy of International ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

SUNDAY<br />

Recent literature has questioned why multinational corporations (MNC) relocate their headquarters activities<br />

overseas. In this paper, we investigate the consequences <strong>of</strong> this phenomenon. To do this, we conceptualize the<br />

MNC headquarters activities as an interdependent system, and develop a set <strong>of</strong> propositions that links<br />

headquarters unbundling and relocation to complexity and rising coordination costs. Moreover, we argue that<br />

the coordination costs are <strong>of</strong>ten neglected in the headquarters reconfiguration process. In sum, we provide a<br />

novel perspective on modern MNC headquarters configurations, derive consequences for MNC research, and<br />

develop a model that aims at explaining the stability <strong>of</strong> such systems. (For more information, please contact:<br />

Phillip C. Nell, Copenhagen Business School, Denmark: pcn.smg@cbs.dk)<br />

Psychic Distance, Control Mechanism and Subsidiary Performance: An Empirical Study <strong>of</strong> Austrian MNCs<br />

Manfred Fuchs, University <strong>of</strong> Graz<br />

Beatrix Jöbstl, University <strong>of</strong> Graz<br />

Mariella Koestner, University <strong>of</strong> Graz<br />

This study analyses antecedents that influence the performance <strong>of</strong> subsidiaries in psychically close and<br />

psychically distant countries. It focuses on the impact <strong>of</strong> control mechanisms between Headquarters and<br />

subsidiaries and how these control mechanisms are determined by psychic distance "effects". The study is<br />

based on the analyses <strong>of</strong> 28 Austrian MNEs and empirically tests HQ-subsidiary relations in 45 subsidiaries,<br />

differentiated in close and distant subsidiary locations. The major objective is to show how psychic distance and<br />

control mechanisms affect subsidiary performance. Our results show that a high level <strong>of</strong> psychic distance,<br />

indicating low familiarity with a host country, is positively associated with performance. Additionally, the<br />

mediating effect <strong>of</strong> control mechanisms provides evidence that subsidiaries located in psychically close host<br />

countries are controlled and integrated more intensively which in turn leads to lower subsidiary performance.<br />

(For more information, please contact: Manfred Fuchs, University <strong>of</strong> Graz, Austria: manfred.fuchs@uni-graz.at)<br />

Understanding the Construct <strong>of</strong> Administrative Heritage<br />

Birton Cowden, Saint Louis University<br />

Administrative Heritage has previously been described as a constraint on existing businesses in making strategic<br />

decisions based on their existing configuration <strong>of</strong> physical assets and the management culture. This article<br />

provides additional items to aid in the understanding <strong>of</strong> the construct <strong>of</strong> administrative heritage and why<br />

existing firms make the decisions that they do. Furthermore, this article introduces the concept <strong>of</strong> administrative<br />

fit to help describe why some firms are constrained by their administrative heritage, while others are not. The<br />

purpose <strong>of</strong> this conceptual paper is to lay a foundation for several future studies. (For more information, please<br />

contact: Birton Cowden, Saint Louis University, USA: bcowden@slu.edu)<br />

What are the Consequences <strong>of</strong> Perceived Parent Company Arrogance<br />

Jakob Lauring, Aarhus University<br />

Poul Houman Andersen, Aarhus University<br />

Marianne Storgaard, Kolding School <strong>of</strong> Design<br />

Hanne Kragh, Aarhus University<br />

Parent companies have a specific status due to size, home market position, and resources that grant them<br />

superiority over their subsidiaries. This superiority is sometimes expressed in situations that subsidiary<br />

employees interpret as arrogance. Such perceptions <strong>of</strong> parent company attitudes and behaviors could have a<br />

number <strong>of</strong> negative consequences for the general functioning <strong>of</strong> MNCs. In this article we argue that perceived<br />

parent company arrogance is an understudied but important subject in MNC management. We illustrate this by<br />

use <strong>of</strong> four qualitative studies. Our findings show that actions that lead to the labeling <strong>of</strong> parent company<br />

representatives as arrogant may be categorized as ignoring, by-passing, and educating. By use <strong>of</strong> social<br />

categorization theory and studies on group dynamics we argue that perceived arrogance could have highly<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 74

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!