AIB 2012 Conference Proceedings - Academy of International ...
AIB 2012 Conference Proceedings - Academy of International ...
AIB 2012 Conference Proceedings - Academy of International ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
SUNDAY<br />
Recent literature has questioned why multinational corporations (MNC) relocate their headquarters activities<br />
overseas. In this paper, we investigate the consequences <strong>of</strong> this phenomenon. To do this, we conceptualize the<br />
MNC headquarters activities as an interdependent system, and develop a set <strong>of</strong> propositions that links<br />
headquarters unbundling and relocation to complexity and rising coordination costs. Moreover, we argue that<br />
the coordination costs are <strong>of</strong>ten neglected in the headquarters reconfiguration process. In sum, we provide a<br />
novel perspective on modern MNC headquarters configurations, derive consequences for MNC research, and<br />
develop a model that aims at explaining the stability <strong>of</strong> such systems. (For more information, please contact:<br />
Phillip C. Nell, Copenhagen Business School, Denmark: pcn.smg@cbs.dk)<br />
Psychic Distance, Control Mechanism and Subsidiary Performance: An Empirical Study <strong>of</strong> Austrian MNCs<br />
Manfred Fuchs, University <strong>of</strong> Graz<br />
Beatrix Jöbstl, University <strong>of</strong> Graz<br />
Mariella Koestner, University <strong>of</strong> Graz<br />
This study analyses antecedents that influence the performance <strong>of</strong> subsidiaries in psychically close and<br />
psychically distant countries. It focuses on the impact <strong>of</strong> control mechanisms between Headquarters and<br />
subsidiaries and how these control mechanisms are determined by psychic distance "effects". The study is<br />
based on the analyses <strong>of</strong> 28 Austrian MNEs and empirically tests HQ-subsidiary relations in 45 subsidiaries,<br />
differentiated in close and distant subsidiary locations. The major objective is to show how psychic distance and<br />
control mechanisms affect subsidiary performance. Our results show that a high level <strong>of</strong> psychic distance,<br />
indicating low familiarity with a host country, is positively associated with performance. Additionally, the<br />
mediating effect <strong>of</strong> control mechanisms provides evidence that subsidiaries located in psychically close host<br />
countries are controlled and integrated more intensively which in turn leads to lower subsidiary performance.<br />
(For more information, please contact: Manfred Fuchs, University <strong>of</strong> Graz, Austria: manfred.fuchs@uni-graz.at)<br />
Understanding the Construct <strong>of</strong> Administrative Heritage<br />
Birton Cowden, Saint Louis University<br />
Administrative Heritage has previously been described as a constraint on existing businesses in making strategic<br />
decisions based on their existing configuration <strong>of</strong> physical assets and the management culture. This article<br />
provides additional items to aid in the understanding <strong>of</strong> the construct <strong>of</strong> administrative heritage and why<br />
existing firms make the decisions that they do. Furthermore, this article introduces the concept <strong>of</strong> administrative<br />
fit to help describe why some firms are constrained by their administrative heritage, while others are not. The<br />
purpose <strong>of</strong> this conceptual paper is to lay a foundation for several future studies. (For more information, please<br />
contact: Birton Cowden, Saint Louis University, USA: bcowden@slu.edu)<br />
What are the Consequences <strong>of</strong> Perceived Parent Company Arrogance<br />
Jakob Lauring, Aarhus University<br />
Poul Houman Andersen, Aarhus University<br />
Marianne Storgaard, Kolding School <strong>of</strong> Design<br />
Hanne Kragh, Aarhus University<br />
Parent companies have a specific status due to size, home market position, and resources that grant them<br />
superiority over their subsidiaries. This superiority is sometimes expressed in situations that subsidiary<br />
employees interpret as arrogance. Such perceptions <strong>of</strong> parent company attitudes and behaviors could have a<br />
number <strong>of</strong> negative consequences for the general functioning <strong>of</strong> MNCs. In this article we argue that perceived<br />
parent company arrogance is an understudied but important subject in MNC management. We illustrate this by<br />
use <strong>of</strong> four qualitative studies. Our findings show that actions that lead to the labeling <strong>of</strong> parent company<br />
representatives as arrogant may be categorized as ignoring, by-passing, and educating. By use <strong>of</strong> social<br />
categorization theory and studies on group dynamics we argue that perceived arrogance could have highly<br />
<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />
Page 74