24.12.2014 Views

AIB 2012 Conference Proceedings - Academy of International ...

AIB 2012 Conference Proceedings - Academy of International ...

AIB 2012 Conference Proceedings - Academy of International ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

TUESDAY<br />

support the argument that FDI reinforces competition. In this paper we analyze the impact <strong>of</strong> FDI on market<br />

concentration considering the Portuguese manufacturing industries in the period 2006-2009. Using panel data<br />

estimation we found a significant negative impact <strong>of</strong> FDI on industry concentration, which is in line with the<br />

results <strong>of</strong> other studies for developed countries, and gives support to arguments that FDI has positive effects on<br />

domestic firms, eventually through positive externalities. (For more information, please contact: Rosa Portela<br />

Forte, University <strong>of</strong> Porto, Portugal: rforte@fep.up.pt)<br />

The Effects <strong>of</strong> Institutional Actors on Investments in <strong>International</strong> Business Relationships<br />

Sara Jonsson, Royal Institute <strong>of</strong> Technology<br />

Kent Eriksson, Royal Institute <strong>of</strong> Technology<br />

Oystein Fjeldstad, Norwegian Business School<br />

This paper contributes to global strategy research by connecting institutional theory with relationship level<br />

international business research in the internationalization process <strong>of</strong> firms. The paper provides empirical<br />

evidence that one kind <strong>of</strong> institutional actor assumes different functions depending on whether it operates in<br />

host or home country and can have different effects on investments in international business relationships.<br />

These effects occur because different institutional actors contribute differently to the knowledge development in<br />

the internationalization process <strong>of</strong> firms. The findings suggest that management <strong>of</strong> institutional actors is a key<br />

strategic issue that should be included in the business plans <strong>of</strong> global firms. (For more information, please<br />

contact: Sara Jonsson, Royal Institute <strong>of</strong> Technology, Sweden: sara.jonsson@abe.kth.se)<br />

Confidence in Learning from Salient Failures: Why (not) Un-adopt the Failed Strategy in Other firms<br />

Jing Yu Yang, University <strong>of</strong> Sydney<br />

Jiatao Li, Hong Kong University <strong>of</strong> Science and Technology<br />

Andrew Delios, National University <strong>of</strong> Singapore<br />

We examine how other firms' failures <strong>of</strong> a strategy affect a focal firm's adoption <strong>of</strong> the strategy. Drawing on the<br />

outcome-based learning perspective, a firm generally responds to others' failures in a strategy by un-adopting<br />

the strategy. We argue the intensity <strong>of</strong> such response is affected by the salience <strong>of</strong> each failure and the<br />

observers' confidence in learning from the overall failures. Our analysis <strong>of</strong> 925 Japanese firms' entries into China<br />

from 1979 to 2000 largely supports the argument. We find that (1) a firm is in general less likely to launch new<br />

entries when observing more salient failure experiences <strong>of</strong> early entrants in the host market, reflected in the<br />

failures' timing, duration, and also their investors' status; whilst (2) such effects become weaker when the<br />

causes to the failures are perceived diverse or transient, making the firm less confident in learning from the<br />

failures. This study highlights important conditions why not firms always avoid adopting the failed strategy in<br />

other firms. (For more information, please contact: Jing Yu Yang, University <strong>of</strong> Sydney, Australia:<br />

gracy.yang@sydney.edu.au)<br />

The Decision <strong>of</strong> Entry Mode in <strong>International</strong> Cooperation Strategies: Cultural Distance or Relative Size <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Host Country<br />

Francisco Figueira de Lemos, Uppsala University<br />

Miguel Matos Torres, University <strong>of</strong> Aveiro<br />

This paper proposes a decision model wherein <strong>International</strong> Joint Ventures and <strong>International</strong> Alliances play as<br />

two possible entry strategies. The conceptual model, based on the risk management conceptualization <strong>of</strong><br />

Figueira de Lemos, Johanson and Vahlne (2011), was tested on a probabilistic model with a dataset <strong>of</strong> 9263<br />

alliances and joint ventures established in 65 different countries, being at least one partner from the United<br />

States. Having cultural distance and country economy size as dependent variables, the model's results show<br />

that US firms prefer to engage in alliances to enter more culturally distant countries, whereas the use <strong>of</strong> joint<br />

ventures more probable as larger the host country's economy. Important to notice at theoretical level is this<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 207

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!