AIB 2012 Conference Proceedings - Academy of International ...
AIB 2012 Conference Proceedings - Academy of International ...
AIB 2012 Conference Proceedings - Academy of International ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
TUESDAY<br />
support the argument that FDI reinforces competition. In this paper we analyze the impact <strong>of</strong> FDI on market<br />
concentration considering the Portuguese manufacturing industries in the period 2006-2009. Using panel data<br />
estimation we found a significant negative impact <strong>of</strong> FDI on industry concentration, which is in line with the<br />
results <strong>of</strong> other studies for developed countries, and gives support to arguments that FDI has positive effects on<br />
domestic firms, eventually through positive externalities. (For more information, please contact: Rosa Portela<br />
Forte, University <strong>of</strong> Porto, Portugal: rforte@fep.up.pt)<br />
The Effects <strong>of</strong> Institutional Actors on Investments in <strong>International</strong> Business Relationships<br />
Sara Jonsson, Royal Institute <strong>of</strong> Technology<br />
Kent Eriksson, Royal Institute <strong>of</strong> Technology<br />
Oystein Fjeldstad, Norwegian Business School<br />
This paper contributes to global strategy research by connecting institutional theory with relationship level<br />
international business research in the internationalization process <strong>of</strong> firms. The paper provides empirical<br />
evidence that one kind <strong>of</strong> institutional actor assumes different functions depending on whether it operates in<br />
host or home country and can have different effects on investments in international business relationships.<br />
These effects occur because different institutional actors contribute differently to the knowledge development in<br />
the internationalization process <strong>of</strong> firms. The findings suggest that management <strong>of</strong> institutional actors is a key<br />
strategic issue that should be included in the business plans <strong>of</strong> global firms. (For more information, please<br />
contact: Sara Jonsson, Royal Institute <strong>of</strong> Technology, Sweden: sara.jonsson@abe.kth.se)<br />
Confidence in Learning from Salient Failures: Why (not) Un-adopt the Failed Strategy in Other firms<br />
Jing Yu Yang, University <strong>of</strong> Sydney<br />
Jiatao Li, Hong Kong University <strong>of</strong> Science and Technology<br />
Andrew Delios, National University <strong>of</strong> Singapore<br />
We examine how other firms' failures <strong>of</strong> a strategy affect a focal firm's adoption <strong>of</strong> the strategy. Drawing on the<br />
outcome-based learning perspective, a firm generally responds to others' failures in a strategy by un-adopting<br />
the strategy. We argue the intensity <strong>of</strong> such response is affected by the salience <strong>of</strong> each failure and the<br />
observers' confidence in learning from the overall failures. Our analysis <strong>of</strong> 925 Japanese firms' entries into China<br />
from 1979 to 2000 largely supports the argument. We find that (1) a firm is in general less likely to launch new<br />
entries when observing more salient failure experiences <strong>of</strong> early entrants in the host market, reflected in the<br />
failures' timing, duration, and also their investors' status; whilst (2) such effects become weaker when the<br />
causes to the failures are perceived diverse or transient, making the firm less confident in learning from the<br />
failures. This study highlights important conditions why not firms always avoid adopting the failed strategy in<br />
other firms. (For more information, please contact: Jing Yu Yang, University <strong>of</strong> Sydney, Australia:<br />
gracy.yang@sydney.edu.au)<br />
The Decision <strong>of</strong> Entry Mode in <strong>International</strong> Cooperation Strategies: Cultural Distance or Relative Size <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Host Country<br />
Francisco Figueira de Lemos, Uppsala University<br />
Miguel Matos Torres, University <strong>of</strong> Aveiro<br />
This paper proposes a decision model wherein <strong>International</strong> Joint Ventures and <strong>International</strong> Alliances play as<br />
two possible entry strategies. The conceptual model, based on the risk management conceptualization <strong>of</strong><br />
Figueira de Lemos, Johanson and Vahlne (2011), was tested on a probabilistic model with a dataset <strong>of</strong> 9263<br />
alliances and joint ventures established in 65 different countries, being at least one partner from the United<br />
States. Having cultural distance and country economy size as dependent variables, the model's results show<br />
that US firms prefer to engage in alliances to enter more culturally distant countries, whereas the use <strong>of</strong> joint<br />
ventures more probable as larger the host country's economy. Important to notice at theoretical level is this<br />
<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />
Page 207