AIB 2012 Conference Proceedings - Academy of International ...
AIB 2012 Conference Proceedings - Academy of International ...
AIB 2012 Conference Proceedings - Academy of International ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
MONDAY<br />
interconnectedness has changed. This has greatly reduced the explanatory and predictive power <strong>of</strong> traditional<br />
theories <strong>of</strong> political risk based on factors such as bargaining power or structural attributes <strong>of</strong> political<br />
institutions. In this paper, we examine the political risk faced by Google in China through the lens <strong>of</strong> both the<br />
traditional bargaining power approach as well as an emergent, legitimacy-based view, and find the latter<br />
perspective to better explain Google's experience. Likewise, we find that Google's experience can be used to<br />
create testable propositions and further conceptual development <strong>of</strong> this legitimacy-based approach to political<br />
risk. (For more information, please contact: Charles Edward Stevens, University <strong>of</strong> Wyoming, USA:<br />
csteve10@uwyo.edu)<br />
Institutional Contexts and Diversification Patterns <strong>of</strong> Business Groups in Emerging Economies: The Case <strong>of</strong><br />
Turkish Family Holdings<br />
Bahattin Karademir, Cukurova University<br />
Huseyin Ozgen, Cukurova University<br />
Atilla Yaprak, Wayne State University<br />
The formation <strong>of</strong> business groups in emerging markets has inspired a growing body <strong>of</strong> literature. While this<br />
literature has addressed the potential motivators <strong>of</strong> these groups' diversification into unrelated industries, their<br />
strategic response to changes in their institutional and market contexts has not been adequately explored. In<br />
this paper, we explore this question through examining the diversification <strong>of</strong> Family Business Groups in Turkey.<br />
We examine the diversification levels <strong>of</strong> 77 business groups, and find slight variation in the diversification level<br />
<strong>of</strong> business groups established in different institutional time periods. We also find that the earlier cohort <strong>of</strong> BGs<br />
is more heterogeneous than the recent cohorts in terms <strong>of</strong> their diversification. We also find that bank-affiliated<br />
groups are more diversified. The diversification <strong>of</strong> business groups is significantly associated with their size and<br />
time <strong>of</strong> founding. The larger size and the earlier cohort <strong>of</strong> business groups are more diversified. In contrast to<br />
conventional wisdom, we find a slight variation in the diversification level <strong>of</strong> business groups established during<br />
the state-centered and the liberalization periods <strong>of</strong> Turkey. We suggest that the state's increasing share in the<br />
economy and slow development <strong>of</strong> market institutions in the post-1980 Liberalization Period explain this finding.<br />
(For more information, please contact: Bahattin Karademir, Cukurova University, Turkey: bdemir@cu.edu.tr)<br />
Session: 2.4.P - Panel<br />
Track: 1 - Institutions, Governance, and CSR<br />
Showcase Panel on Institutional Theory in <strong>International</strong> Business<br />
Presented On: July 2, <strong>2012</strong> - 14:30-15:45<br />
Chair: Timothy M. Devinney, University <strong>of</strong> Technology, Sydney<br />
Co-Chair: Laszlo Tihanyi, Texas A&M University<br />
Panelists:<br />
Michael Hitt, Texas A&M University<br />
Robert Hoskisson, Rice University<br />
Stewart Miller, University <strong>of</strong> Texas at San Antonio<br />
Torben Pedersen, Copenhagen Business School<br />
This highly interactive panel focuses on the use <strong>of</strong> institutional theory in international business research. The<br />
goals <strong>of</strong> the session are to introduce new ideas and frameworks from the traditions <strong>of</strong> neoinstitutional<br />
economics and sociology and to provide answers to theoretical and methodological questions related to the<br />
design <strong>of</strong> empirical studies from the institutional perspective. The session is organized around ideas and papers<br />
in the forthcoming volume <strong>of</strong> the Advances in <strong>International</strong> Management series (Emerald) <strong>of</strong> the same title and<br />
presents a great opportunity for informed debate about the field. Using ""roundtables"" led by leading scholars,<br />
<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />
Page 164