24.12.2014 Views

AIB 2012 Conference Proceedings - Academy of International ...

AIB 2012 Conference Proceedings - Academy of International ...

AIB 2012 Conference Proceedings - Academy of International ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

MONDAY<br />

The Role <strong>of</strong> Power-Dependence on Innovation Generation in <strong>International</strong> Customer-Supplier Relationship<br />

Ruey-Jer Bryan Jean, National Chengchi University<br />

Rudolf Sinkovics, University <strong>of</strong> Manchester<br />

Daekwan Kim, Florida State University<br />

While innovations generated by supply channel relationships, as opposed to individual partners, are playing an<br />

increasingly important role in the success <strong>of</strong> all supply chain partners, there has been a dearth <strong>of</strong> research in<br />

the literature on how supply chain relationships cultivate the process <strong>of</strong> such innovation generation. This study<br />

explores supplier market intelligence generation, relationship learning, systems collaboration, and technological<br />

uncertainty, as antecedents <strong>of</strong> supplier innovation generation, which is, in turn, hypothesized to positively affect<br />

the relationship performance <strong>of</strong> the supplier. Furthermore, supplier dependence on the buyer is investigated as<br />

a moderator <strong>of</strong> the effects <strong>of</strong> such antecedents on supplier innovation generation. According to the empirical<br />

tests, which used a sample <strong>of</strong> 236 Taiwanese executives, most <strong>of</strong> the hypotheses in the study are supported.<br />

Some implications <strong>of</strong> the results are discussed at the end. (For more information, please contact: Ruey-Jer<br />

Bryan Jean, National Chengchi University, Taiwan: bryan@nccu.edu.tw)<br />

Session: 2.3.7 - Competitive<br />

Track: 3 - IB Theory, FDI, and Entry Mode<br />

Emerging-Market MNEs<br />

Presented On: July 2, <strong>2012</strong> - 13:00-14:15<br />

Chair: Lin Cui, Australian National University<br />

Macro Determinants <strong>of</strong> Chinese Cross-border Mergers and Acquisitions in Developed Markets<br />

Monica Yang, Adelphi University<br />

This paper investigates the factors determining the level <strong>of</strong> cross-border mergers and acquisitions (CBMA) by<br />

emerging market firms in developed markets. We draw on traditional economic and the organizational learning<br />

perspectives to develop several hypotheses. Using panel data <strong>of</strong> Chinese CBMA in nine developed markets from<br />

1996 to 2010, we found that economic factors (e.g., the wealth and strategic asset <strong>of</strong> host market) and<br />

financial factors (e.g., the size and liquidity <strong>of</strong> financial market) positively affected the number <strong>of</strong> CBMAs by<br />

China in developed markets. Other economic factors (e.g., the size <strong>of</strong> market and the level <strong>of</strong> openness to<br />

international trade) and the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> government were negatively influenced the number <strong>of</strong> CBMAs in<br />

these developed markets. Finally, the growth <strong>of</strong> market and the "learning from others" factor had no significant<br />

impact. (For more information, please contact: Monica Yang, Adelphi University, USA: yang2@adelphi.edu)<br />

Sub-National Institutional Heterogeneity and Entry Ownership: Evidence <strong>of</strong> Investment from Mexico, India, and<br />

China into Developed Markets<br />

Victor Zitian Chen, University <strong>of</strong> North Carolina; Columbia University<br />

Jing Li, Simon Fraser University<br />

Daniel M. Shapiro, Simon Fraser University<br />

This paper focuses on the decision <strong>of</strong> entry ownership <strong>of</strong> emerging-market (EM) MNEs into developed markets<br />

(DMs). First, I argue that, all else being equal, the direct effect on the choice <strong>of</strong> full-ownership entry is positive,<br />

because whereas MNEs from EMs with weaker market-based institutions must engage in joint ventures for<br />

adaption to local external legitimacy in DMs, institutional development at home will reduce uncertainty with<br />

respect to legitimacy, and the resulting need for joint ownership, and thus increase the likelihood that firms will<br />

choose full-ownership entry. Second, institutional development at home encourages EM MNEs to build FSAs<br />

such as technological capabilities, which in turn lead them to seek full ownership <strong>of</strong> their foreign subsidiaries.<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 150

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!