24.12.2014 Views

AIB 2012 Conference Proceedings - Academy of International ...

AIB 2012 Conference Proceedings - Academy of International ...

AIB 2012 Conference Proceedings - Academy of International ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

SUNDAY<br />

Session: 1.3.9 - Competitive<br />

Track: 2 - Marketing and Supply Chain<br />

Manufacturer Responsiveness, Market Orientation, and Supply Chain Issues<br />

Presented On: July 1, <strong>2012</strong> - 13:00-14:15<br />

Chair: Panagiotis Ganotakis, Leeds University<br />

Responsiveness across Markets: Evidence from Automobile Recalls<br />

Kashef A. Majid, George Washington University<br />

A primary portion <strong>of</strong> a firm's marketing orientation is its responsiveness which entails absorbing feedback from<br />

consumers and transferring it back throughout the organization in order to enhance the operations <strong>of</strong> the<br />

organization. Using product recalls within the auto industry <strong>of</strong> the United States and the United Kingdom we<br />

examine the affect <strong>of</strong>: institutional, product level, and firm level factors on a firm's responsiveness. Our<br />

findings indicate that the institutional environment, specifically the strength <strong>of</strong> regulations, can impact a firm's<br />

level <strong>of</strong> responsiveness. Further, we also find evidence that specific product designs and the scope <strong>of</strong> the firm's<br />

operations in a given market can have a significant influence on the responsiveness <strong>of</strong> the firm. (For more<br />

information, please contact: Kashef A. Majid, George Washington University, USA: kashef@gwmail.gwu.edu)<br />

Market Orientation and Export Performance<br />

Xinming He, Newcastle University<br />

Keith D. Brouthers, North Carolina State University<br />

Igor Filatotchev, WU Vienna<br />

Market orientation has been shown to provide a valuable resource-based advantage in domestic markets, yet it<br />

is less clear how firms can benefit from this capability as they expand abroad. We develop and test theory to<br />

suggest that although MO capabilities can lead to improved export performance, the export channel a firm uses<br />

and the institutional distance between home and export market can affect the benefits derived. Using a sample<br />

<strong>of</strong> Chinese exporters we find that firms with stronger MO capabilities can improve export performance by using<br />

hierarchical export channels and by exporting to more institutionally distant markets where MO capabilities<br />

provide greater value. Thus this paper makes several important contributions to the literature by providing a<br />

better understanding <strong>of</strong> how firms can successfully deploy MO capabilities when exporting. (For more<br />

information, please contact: Keith D. Brouthers, North Carolina State University, USA:<br />

keith_brouthers@ncsu.edu)<br />

<strong>International</strong> Specialization: A Bridge between Polar Views <strong>of</strong> Operating Flexibility and Location-Specific<br />

Commitment<br />

Ingo Kleindienst, WHU<br />

Christian Geisler Asmussen, Copenhagen Business School<br />

Thomas Hutzschenreuter, WHU<br />

Torben Pedersen, Copenhagen Business School<br />

Whether and how international diversification and cross-border arbitrage affects firm performance remains one<br />

<strong>of</strong> the major unresolved research questions in the strategy and international business literatures. We propose<br />

that knowing how much a firm has internationally diversified tells us very little about performance implications,<br />

if we do not know, and do not ask, how the firm has diversified. Therefore, building on the two broad<br />

arguments <strong>of</strong> operating flexibility and location-specific commitment, we develop a theoretical framework that<br />

focuses on the extent to which a firm's international arbitrage strategy is characterized by specialization versus<br />

replication and argue that these different strategies may have differential impact on pr<strong>of</strong>itability and risk<br />

<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />

Page 43

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!