AIB 2012 Conference Proceedings - Academy of International ...
AIB 2012 Conference Proceedings - Academy of International ...
AIB 2012 Conference Proceedings - Academy of International ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
SUNDAY<br />
Session: 1.3.9 - Competitive<br />
Track: 2 - Marketing and Supply Chain<br />
Manufacturer Responsiveness, Market Orientation, and Supply Chain Issues<br />
Presented On: July 1, <strong>2012</strong> - 13:00-14:15<br />
Chair: Panagiotis Ganotakis, Leeds University<br />
Responsiveness across Markets: Evidence from Automobile Recalls<br />
Kashef A. Majid, George Washington University<br />
A primary portion <strong>of</strong> a firm's marketing orientation is its responsiveness which entails absorbing feedback from<br />
consumers and transferring it back throughout the organization in order to enhance the operations <strong>of</strong> the<br />
organization. Using product recalls within the auto industry <strong>of</strong> the United States and the United Kingdom we<br />
examine the affect <strong>of</strong>: institutional, product level, and firm level factors on a firm's responsiveness. Our<br />
findings indicate that the institutional environment, specifically the strength <strong>of</strong> regulations, can impact a firm's<br />
level <strong>of</strong> responsiveness. Further, we also find evidence that specific product designs and the scope <strong>of</strong> the firm's<br />
operations in a given market can have a significant influence on the responsiveness <strong>of</strong> the firm. (For more<br />
information, please contact: Kashef A. Majid, George Washington University, USA: kashef@gwmail.gwu.edu)<br />
Market Orientation and Export Performance<br />
Xinming He, Newcastle University<br />
Keith D. Brouthers, North Carolina State University<br />
Igor Filatotchev, WU Vienna<br />
Market orientation has been shown to provide a valuable resource-based advantage in domestic markets, yet it<br />
is less clear how firms can benefit from this capability as they expand abroad. We develop and test theory to<br />
suggest that although MO capabilities can lead to improved export performance, the export channel a firm uses<br />
and the institutional distance between home and export market can affect the benefits derived. Using a sample<br />
<strong>of</strong> Chinese exporters we find that firms with stronger MO capabilities can improve export performance by using<br />
hierarchical export channels and by exporting to more institutionally distant markets where MO capabilities<br />
provide greater value. Thus this paper makes several important contributions to the literature by providing a<br />
better understanding <strong>of</strong> how firms can successfully deploy MO capabilities when exporting. (For more<br />
information, please contact: Keith D. Brouthers, North Carolina State University, USA:<br />
keith_brouthers@ncsu.edu)<br />
<strong>International</strong> Specialization: A Bridge between Polar Views <strong>of</strong> Operating Flexibility and Location-Specific<br />
Commitment<br />
Ingo Kleindienst, WHU<br />
Christian Geisler Asmussen, Copenhagen Business School<br />
Thomas Hutzschenreuter, WHU<br />
Torben Pedersen, Copenhagen Business School<br />
Whether and how international diversification and cross-border arbitrage affects firm performance remains one<br />
<strong>of</strong> the major unresolved research questions in the strategy and international business literatures. We propose<br />
that knowing how much a firm has internationally diversified tells us very little about performance implications,<br />
if we do not know, and do not ask, how the firm has diversified. Therefore, building on the two broad<br />
arguments <strong>of</strong> operating flexibility and location-specific commitment, we develop a theoretical framework that<br />
focuses on the extent to which a firm's international arbitrage strategy is characterized by specialization versus<br />
replication and argue that these different strategies may have differential impact on pr<strong>of</strong>itability and risk<br />
<strong>AIB</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Conference</strong> <strong>Proceedings</strong><br />
Page 43