Our performance in 2009 - Sappi
Our performance in 2009 - Sappi
Our performance in 2009 - Sappi
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
72<br />
Accountability<br />
Responsibility<br />
Corporate governance cont<strong>in</strong>ued<br />
Element/best practice <strong>Sappi</strong> application/comments K<strong>in</strong>g III report implications<br />
The board should regularly review<br />
processes and procedures to ensure<br />
the effectiveness of the company’s<br />
<strong>in</strong>ternal systems of control, so that its<br />
decision-mak<strong>in</strong>g capability and the<br />
accuracy of its report<strong>in</strong>g are ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed<br />
at a high level at all times<br />
Risk management: the board must<br />
identify key risk areas and monitor<br />
effectiveness of the risk management<br />
process<br />
This review is primarily the role of the audit<br />
committee; refer to the further disclosure on its<br />
activities <strong>in</strong> this section<br />
A management committee is responsible for the<br />
implementation of risk management. The board<br />
monitors the overall process of risk management<br />
<strong>in</strong> conjunction with the audit committee<br />
Induction and tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g of directors Induction programmes are tailored for each<br />
<strong>in</strong>dividual director on appo<strong>in</strong>tment as a director<br />
and cont<strong>in</strong>ued <strong>in</strong>dividual tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g is available<br />
thereafter<br />
Terms should not exceed three years<br />
but re-election by shareholders at<br />
the AGM is allowed, if eligible<br />
Skills, experience, background<br />
and new ideas<br />
The board has the right to appo<strong>in</strong>t new directors<br />
dur<strong>in</strong>g the year and the appo<strong>in</strong>tments of such<br />
directors require to be confirmed by shareholders<br />
at the next annual general meet<strong>in</strong>g (AGM) after<br />
the appo<strong>in</strong>tment. Such directors are also<br />
required to retire at that AGM and are eligible for<br />
re-election to the board. A programme of<br />
staggered rotation is <strong>in</strong> place whereby directors<br />
retire by rotation at least every three years and<br />
can be re-elected by shareholders at the AGM.<br />
The nom<strong>in</strong>ation and governance committee<br />
makes recommendations to the board as to<br />
eligibility, tak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to account past <strong>performance</strong><br />
and contribution. The board, <strong>in</strong> turn, makes<br />
recommendations for re-election to the<br />
shareholders at the AGM<br />
All candidates for board positions are considered<br />
and evaluated by the nom<strong>in</strong>ation and<br />
governance committee prior to nom<strong>in</strong>ation and<br />
appo<strong>in</strong>tment to the board. Factors considered for<br />
new candidates and for exist<strong>in</strong>g board members<br />
dur<strong>in</strong>g annual evaluation, <strong>in</strong>clude background,<br />
skills, experience, <strong>performance</strong>, as well as a<br />
balance between cont<strong>in</strong>uity and the need for new<br />
ideas. The evaluation of directors <strong>in</strong>cludes an<br />
<strong>in</strong>terview with the chairman and senior<br />
<strong>in</strong>dependent, non-executive directors who<br />
report back to the nom<strong>in</strong>ation and governance<br />
committee as well as a self-assessment<br />
based evaluation<br />
A comb<strong>in</strong>ed assurance model will be<br />
formalised dur<strong>in</strong>g 2010 with oversight by<br />
the audit committee<br />
A formally documented holistic review<br />
(based on the comb<strong>in</strong>ed assurance) of<br />
<strong>in</strong>ternal f<strong>in</strong>ancial controls will be performed<br />
by the audit committee with their<br />
conclusions reported to the board<br />
and stakeholders<br />
Risk management process is currently<br />
be<strong>in</strong>g revised with oversight from the audit<br />
committee and board. One of the items to<br />
consider is the recommendation that a risk<br />
committee be appo<strong>in</strong>ted by the board as a<br />
stand<strong>in</strong>g committee. <strong>Sappi</strong> is of the view<br />
that the current oversight by the audit<br />
committee and board together with the<br />
group risk management team sufficiently<br />
addresses this aspect<br />
Substantially adopted. Additional tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g for<br />
directors regard<strong>in</strong>g risk and IT governance<br />
<strong>in</strong> 2010<br />
√<br />
√