11.07.2015 Views

The Bourgeois Virtues: Ethics for an Age of Commerce

The Bourgeois Virtues: Ethics for an Age of Commerce

The Bourgeois Virtues: Ethics for an Age of Commerce

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

164 chapter 11qualities <strong>for</strong> a fit prose are regularity, uni<strong>for</strong>mity, precision, bal<strong>an</strong>ce....But<strong>an</strong> almost exclusive attention to these qualities involves some repressing <strong>an</strong>dsilencing <strong>of</strong> poetry. 14 “Regularity, uni<strong>for</strong>mity, precision, bal<strong>an</strong>ce”: he mightas well have said “literary Prudence <strong>an</strong>d Temper<strong>an</strong>ce in their bourgeoisexpressions.” It is no surprise to find Arnold the nineteenth-centuryHellenist commending poetry <strong>for</strong> <strong>an</strong> aristocratic expression <strong>of</strong> the virtues,its “glory, the eternal honor, ...this noble sphere.” 15 Arnold is not exactlycontemptuous <strong>of</strong> the literally prosaic virtues <strong>of</strong> the bourgeoisie. He isnot a proud aristocrat, not actually. But in judging poetry he takes hisst<strong>an</strong>d on the plains <strong>of</strong> Ilium or in the courts <strong>of</strong> Shakespeare’s imaginedage <strong>of</strong> L<strong>an</strong>caster <strong>an</strong>d York, not in the c<strong>of</strong>feehouses <strong>of</strong> Addison’s London,or the London <strong>of</strong> Chaucer, either, that hive <strong>of</strong> the bourgeoisie be<strong>for</strong>e itsgreater time.<strong>The</strong> second b<strong>an</strong>ishment <strong>of</strong> religious faith <strong>an</strong>d hope gathers <strong>for</strong>ceamong secularizing intellectuals around the middle <strong>of</strong> the nineteenthcentury. A. N. Wilson attributes the odd hiccup in the b<strong>an</strong>ishment—on inthe eighteenth century, then <strong>of</strong>f, then on again in the mid-nineteenth—to“Hume’s time bomb,” that is, Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion,published in 1779, three years safely after Hume’s death <strong>an</strong>d three years,too, after the publication <strong>of</strong> <strong>an</strong>other <strong>an</strong>ti-Christi<strong>an</strong> bomb with a long fuse,Gibbon’s Decline <strong>an</strong>d Fall <strong>of</strong> the Rom<strong>an</strong> Empire. In Wilson’s view these sat onlibrary shelves until the new seriousness <strong>of</strong> religiosity in Engl<strong>an</strong>d in the1820s <strong>an</strong>d 1830s caused them to be taken down <strong>an</strong>d examined. In their owntime, Hume could logic-chop <strong>an</strong>d Gibbon sneer <strong>an</strong>d the cosmopolites <strong>of</strong>1776–1779 could laugh along with them. Not the sober <strong>an</strong>d intellectuallyserious late Georgi<strong>an</strong>s <strong>an</strong>d early Victori<strong>an</strong>s. 16Arnold himself, though a deist <strong>an</strong>d a devout student <strong>of</strong> the Bible, said it(“Dover Beach” was composed about 1851):<strong>The</strong> Sea <strong>of</strong> FaithWas once, too, at the full, <strong>an</strong>d round earth’s shoreLay like the folds <strong>of</strong> a great girdle furled.But now I only hearIts mel<strong>an</strong>choly, long, withdrawing roar....Or Edward FitzGerald in 1859, though the sentiments are <strong>of</strong> course also <strong>an</strong>cient<strong>an</strong>d Epicure<strong>an</strong> <strong>an</strong>d indeed secularly Persi<strong>an</strong> <strong>of</strong> the early twelfth century:Myself when young did eagerly frequentDoctor <strong>an</strong>d Saint, <strong>an</strong>d heard great argument

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!