11.07.2015 Views

The Bourgeois Virtues: Ethics for an Age of Commerce

The Bourgeois Virtues: Ethics for an Age of Commerce

The Bourgeois Virtues: Ethics for an Age of Commerce

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2 apologyVolkswagen, all <strong>of</strong> them, used slave labor, with impunity. <strong>The</strong> bourgeoisb<strong>an</strong>kers <strong>of</strong> Switzerl<strong>an</strong>d stored gold <strong>for</strong> the Nazis. M<strong>an</strong>y a businessm<strong>an</strong> is <strong>an</strong>ethical shell or worse. Even the virtues <strong>of</strong> the bourgeoisie, Lord knows, donot lead straight to heaven.But the assaults on the alleged vices <strong>of</strong> the bourgeoisie <strong>an</strong>d capitalismafter 1848 made <strong>an</strong> impossible Best into the enemy <strong>of</strong> <strong>an</strong> actual Good. <strong>The</strong>yled in the twentieth century to some versions <strong>of</strong> hell. In the twenty-first century,please—dear Lord, please—let us avoid <strong>an</strong>other visit to hell.I don’t much care how “capitalism” is defined, so long as it is not defineda priori to me<strong>an</strong> vice incarnate. <strong>The</strong> prejudging definition was favored byRousseau—though he did not literally use the word “capitalism,” still to becoined—<strong>an</strong>d by Proudhon, Marx, Bakunin, Kropotkin, Luxembourg,Veblen, Goldm<strong>an</strong>, Pol<strong>an</strong>yi, Sartre. Less obviously the same definition wasused by their opponents Bentham, Ricardo, R<strong>an</strong>d, Friedm<strong>an</strong>, Becker. All <strong>of</strong>them, left <strong>an</strong>d right, defined commercial society at the outset to be bad by<strong>an</strong>y st<strong>an</strong>dard higher th<strong>an</strong> successful greed.Such a definition makes pointless <strong>an</strong> inquiry into the good <strong>an</strong>d bad <strong>of</strong>modern commercial society. I think this is what economists like DouglassNorth, looking recently into the history <strong>of</strong> institutions, have been seeing:that there’s something going on from 1500 to the present beyond maximumutility on a narrow definition. That is what the middle ground <strong>of</strong> socialthinking in the past three centuries, with which I associate myself, hasbelieved: Montesquieu, Smith, Tocqueville, Keynes, Aron, Hirschm<strong>an</strong>. Ifmodern capitalism is defined to be the same thing as Greed—“the restlessnever-ending process <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>it-making alone ...,this boundless greed afterriches,” as Marx put it in chapter 1 <strong>of</strong> Capital, drawing on <strong>an</strong> <strong>an</strong>ticommercialtheme originating in Aristotle—then that settles it, be<strong>for</strong>e looking at theevidence.<strong>The</strong>re’s no evidence, actually, that greed or miserliness or self-interestwas new in the sixteenth or the nineteenth or <strong>an</strong>y other century. Auri sacrafames, “<strong>for</strong> gold the infamous hunger,” is from <strong>The</strong> Aeneid, book 3, line 57,not from Benjamin Fr<strong>an</strong>klin or Advertising <strong>Age</strong>. <strong>The</strong> propensity to truck <strong>an</strong>dbarter is hum<strong>an</strong> nature. <strong>Commerce</strong> is not some evil product <strong>of</strong> recent m<strong>an</strong>ufacture.Commercial behavior is one <strong>of</strong> the world’s oldest pr<strong>of</strong>essions. Wehave documentation <strong>of</strong> it from the earliest cunei<strong>for</strong>m writing, in clay businessletters from Kish or Ashur <strong>of</strong>fering compliments to your lovely wife<strong>an</strong>d making a deal <strong>for</strong> copper from Anatolia or lapis lazuli from

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!