11.07.2015 Views

The Bourgeois Virtues: Ethics for an Age of Commerce

The Bourgeois Virtues: Ethics for an Age of Commerce

The Bourgeois Virtues: Ethics for an Age of Commerce

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

404 chapter 37would keep this crushingly learned <strong>an</strong>d prolific jurist <strong>of</strong>f the SupremeCourt. Posner is intelligent—though persistently <strong>an</strong>d stubbornly misled.As he himself acknowledges, “That <strong>an</strong>y sort <strong>of</strong> rape license [or slaverylicense or <strong>an</strong>y-takings license] is even thinkable within the framework <strong>of</strong> thewealth-maximization theory that guides so much <strong>of</strong> the <strong>an</strong>alysis in this bookwill strike m<strong>an</strong>y readers as a limitation on the usefulness <strong>of</strong> that theory.”It might.Holmes wrote similarly, with lips curled in disdain: “From societies <strong>for</strong>the prevention <strong>of</strong> cruelty to <strong>an</strong>imals up to socialism, we express . . . howhard it is to be wounded in the battle <strong>of</strong> life, how terrible, how unjust it isthat <strong>an</strong>y one should fail.” 38 Rights, he wrote to Harold Laski in 1925, aremerely “what a given crowd ...will fight <strong>for</strong>.” 39<strong>The</strong> Atheni<strong>an</strong>s spoke likewise, enjoining the preachy Meli<strong>an</strong>s “to let‘right’ alone <strong>an</strong>d talk only <strong>of</strong> interest.” As the Meli<strong>an</strong>s had predicted, though,the tough, willful, efficient, assertive, courageous, economistic, plutocratic,rights-ignoring, future-oriented, sociopathic Atheni<strong>an</strong> guys soon found in413 at Syracuse <strong>an</strong>d finally in 404, utterly defeated by their now very numerousenemies, that their tough words had <strong>for</strong> themselves, also, vacated “whatis our common protection, the privilege <strong>of</strong> being allowed in d<strong>an</strong>ger to evokewhat is fair <strong>an</strong>d right.” King Lear protests to Reg<strong>an</strong> <strong>an</strong>d Goneril to “reasonnot the [<strong>for</strong>ward-looking <strong>an</strong>d utilitari<strong>an</strong>] need” but rather what is owed injustice to a king <strong>an</strong>d father. But the evil sisters, like the Atheni<strong>an</strong>s, areunmoved by such ethical appeals. “One day,” writes Michael Ignatieff <strong>of</strong> thepassage in the play, “the look <strong>of</strong> entreaty will be met by the stare <strong>of</strong> <strong>for</strong>ce.” 40As a theory <strong>of</strong> ethics, this macho talk <strong>of</strong> Prudence Only, diamond-hard<strong>an</strong>d unflinching, with the stare <strong>of</strong> <strong>for</strong>ce <strong>an</strong>d the most recent scientific backing,has weaknesses.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!