The Bourgeois Virtues: Ethics for an Age of Commerce

notes to pages 334–346 5434. James, Pragmatism, 1907,p.259.5. McCloskey, Rhetoric of Economics, 1985,pp.45–46.6. Booth, Modern Dogma, 1974.7. Putnam, Realism, 1990, pp. vii, 115.8. Toulmin, Human Understanding, 1972,p.vii.9. Harré, Varieties of Realism, 1986,p.90.10. Blaug, Methodology of Economics, 1980,p.131.11. Hausman and McPherson, Economic Analysis and Moral Philosophy, 1996,p.212.12. Hausman and McPherson, Economic Analysis and Moral Philosophy, 1996,p.212.13. Lewis, Mere Christianity, 1952,p.35.14. Murdoch,Metaphysics, 1992,p.26.15. Hampshire, Postscript, 1982, to Hampshire, Thought and Action, 1959,p.274.16. Kant, Practical Reason, 1788, 6,problem 2, “Remark.”chapter 30: against reduction1. Mill, “The Mind and Character of Jeremy Bentham,” 1838,p.318, italics his.2. I am indebted to Eli Berman of the University of California at San Diego for a discussionof these matters.3. Frank, What Price the Moral High Ground? 2004,p.26.4. Sen,Ethics and Economics, 1987,p.13.5. Hammett, Maltese Falcon, 1929,p.215.6. Frank, Passions within Reason, 1988,p.xi.7. Frankfurt, Reasons of Love, 2004,p.42.8. Peterson and Seligman, eds., Character Strengths and Virtues, 2004,p.19.9. Tocqueville, Democracy in America, 1840, vol. 2,p.130.10. Nozick, Invariances, 2001,p.244. The next two quotations are from pp. 246 and 256.11. Nozick, Invariances, 2001,p.248.12. Nozick, Invariances, 2001,p.280. The Examined Life, 1989,pp.212–215.13. Nozick, Philosophical Explanations, 1981, chap. 5,pp.499–570. Notably, the last book (2001)has the same structure as the 1981 one: epistemology, metaphysics (especially free will), and ethics.14. Nozick, The Examined Life, 1989,pp.214–215.15. Nozick, Philosophical Explanations, 1981,pp.515ff.16. Nozick, Invariances, 2001,p.288.17. This is the model pioneered by Lawrence Iannoccone in the 1970s, explained in Iannoccone,“Introduction to the Economics of Religion,” 1998.18. Cox,Imperial Fault Lines, 2002, and personal correspondence.19. White 2004, “Weakness of Will,” surveys the contributions, pp. 4–6.20. Strachey,Eminent Victorians 1918,p.84.chapter 31: character(s)1. Smith, Moral Sentiments, 1790, pp.294, 137; and part 1, “Of the Propriety of Action,” towhich merit (part 2), duty (3), utility (4), and custom (5) are subordinated.2. Hariman, “Theory without Modernity,” 2003,p.8.