11.07.2015 Views

The Bourgeois Virtues: Ethics for an Age of Commerce

The Bourgeois Virtues: Ethics for an Age of Commerce

The Bourgeois Virtues: Ethics for an Age of Commerce

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

the pag<strong>an</strong>-ethical bourgeois 297the West. Indeed the two Jap<strong>an</strong>ese intellectuals Inoue discusses as beginningin the 1920s to drain jinkaku <strong>of</strong> its hierarchical me<strong>an</strong>ing were among the1 percent <strong>of</strong> the population pr<strong>of</strong>essing Christi<strong>an</strong>ity. As Robert Bellah notes,in Jap<strong>an</strong> “Christi<strong>an</strong>s played a role out <strong>of</strong> all proportion to their numbers inthe cause <strong>of</strong> social re<strong>for</strong>m in the period be<strong>for</strong>e World War II.” 19In <strong>an</strong> aristocratic <strong>an</strong>d hierarchical society <strong>of</strong> status <strong>an</strong>d shame, the fourpag<strong>an</strong> virtues lead up to honor = the courage, justice, <strong>an</strong>d faith to take thefront r<strong>an</strong>k in the line <strong>of</strong> battle. In our bourgeois <strong>an</strong>d egalitari<strong>an</strong> society <strong>of</strong>contract <strong>an</strong>d guilt, they lead up to honesty = the courage, justice, <strong>an</strong>d faithto be reliable in making a deal.<strong>The</strong> ethical bourgeois c<strong>an</strong> be seen in his enemies. Consider Je<strong>an</strong>-Paul Sartre,who remained a fellow traveler long after Khrushchev’s destalinizationspeech, long after the Hungari<strong>an</strong> Revolution, long after the disappointments<strong>of</strong> actually existing socialism. “<strong>The</strong> philosopher <strong>of</strong> liberty,” RaymondAron wrote, “never m<strong>an</strong>aged, or resigned himself, to see communism as itis. He never diagnosed Soviet totalitari<strong>an</strong>ism, the c<strong>an</strong>cer <strong>of</strong> the century, <strong>an</strong>dhe never condemned it as such.” 20 In his youth <strong>an</strong>d in his age he was, withSimone de Beauvoir <strong>an</strong>d that generation <strong>of</strong> French intellectuals, unthinkingly<strong>an</strong>tibourgeois. It is ironic, by the way, that Sartre <strong>an</strong>d Beauvoir bothused metaphors <strong>of</strong> market dealings in describing their “open” relationship—well...open <strong>for</strong> Sartre—<strong>an</strong>d the sexual ideal <strong>of</strong> free men <strong>an</strong>dwomen.<strong>The</strong> ethical content <strong>of</strong> Sartre’s early work such as Being <strong>an</strong>d Nothingnesshas been brilli<strong>an</strong>tly drawn out by Ronald S<strong>an</strong>toni, in his 1995 book Bad Faith,Good Faith, <strong>an</strong>d Authenticity in Sartre’s Early Philosophy. S<strong>an</strong>toni sees thepassage from “bad faith” (mauvaise foi) to Heideggeri<strong>an</strong> “authenticity” asethical—this against the popular parody <strong>of</strong> existentialism as amoral, a ValleyGirl “Whatever.” Bad faith is lying to oneself. Good faith attempts at least notto lie. <strong>The</strong> third <strong>an</strong>d most noble state, authenticity, ascends to a still higherlevel, accepting the ambiguities <strong>an</strong>d ethical responsibilities <strong>of</strong> a full life.But Sartre seems to be importing a specifically political concern into hisethical thinking. Good faith, or sincerity, is (hélas, Sartre would add) a bourgeoisvirtue, that is to say, a virtue the capitalist system would honor, at leastin its preachments. In this way <strong>of</strong> looking at it, bad faith would be the m<strong>an</strong>ner<strong>of</strong> life <strong>of</strong> the very worst <strong>of</strong> the bourgeoisie. In writing <strong>of</strong> good faith,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!