13.07.2015 Views

Aspect in Ancient Greek - Nijmegen Centre for Semantics

Aspect in Ancient Greek - Nijmegen Centre for Semantics

Aspect in Ancient Greek - Nijmegen Centre for Semantics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

4.5 Aorist and coercion: the <strong>in</strong>gressive and complexive <strong>in</strong>terpretations 95Note that the orig<strong>in</strong>al predicate would not violate the Duration Pr<strong>in</strong>ciple,s<strong>in</strong>ce stative predicates are compatible with time po<strong>in</strong>t adverbials such as immediately.This predicate, however, is not of the required aspectual class, asthe aorist selects <strong>for</strong> bounded predicates. As a result, a literal <strong>in</strong>terpretationis not available and we have to choose between an <strong>in</strong>gressive and a complexive<strong>in</strong>terpretation.In example (111) the topic time was longer. It was the whole life of thespeaker, Socrates. As a result, there a complexive <strong>in</strong>terpretation was possible.Purely on the basis of the semantics, however, an <strong>in</strong>gressive <strong>in</strong>terpretationwould be possible too, <strong>for</strong> the beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g of be<strong>in</strong>g a senator can also be <strong>in</strong>cluded<strong>in</strong> the time span of a whole life. Why is it that the natural <strong>in</strong>terpretation isthe complexive one? This is probably due to the fact that the complexive<strong>in</strong>terpretation is stronger. It entails the <strong>in</strong>gressive <strong>in</strong>terpretation: if the completeeventuality of be<strong>in</strong>g a senator is <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> the topic time, the beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>gmust be <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> the topic time as well. It’s a common phenomenon thatthe <strong>in</strong>terpreter chooses the strongest <strong>in</strong>terpretation available. This pr<strong>in</strong>ciple isoften referred to as the Strongest Mean<strong>in</strong>g Hypothesis (Dalrymple et al. 1998).Let’s now have a second look at (114), the cont<strong>in</strong>uation of which is given<strong>in</strong> (118):(118) µαθνMathōnδέdeperceive.aor.ptcp.nom prtδακρσαντα ερετοdakrusanta eiretoweep.aor.ptcp.acc ask.pst.ipfv.3sgµιν Αρτάβανο̋m<strong>in</strong> Artabanushim.accλλήλων κεχωρισµέναallēlōn kechōrismenaone.other.gen separate.prf.pass.ptcp.accτεteκαkaiλίγωoligōiprt prt a.little.datγρgarbecauseσεωυτνseōutonyourself.accπρτερονproteron.be<strong>for</strong>eArtabanus.nomτάδε ...tade: ...this.acc......̋hōshowπολλνpollonfarργάσαοergasaodo.pst.aor.2sgµακαρίσα̋Makarisasdeclare.happy.aor.ptcp.nomδ α κ ρ ε ι ̋.dakrueis.weep.PRS.ipfv.2sgννnunnow“Perceiv<strong>in</strong>g that he had begun to weep Artabanus questioned himsay<strong>in</strong>g: ‘What a distance is there between what you are do<strong>in</strong>g nowand a little while ago! After declar<strong>in</strong>g yourself happy you weep.’ ”Hdt. 7.46.1In (114) the choice between an <strong>in</strong>gressive and a complexive <strong>in</strong>terpretation ofδάκρυσε edakruse ‘weep.aor’ cannot be made decisively on the basis of thesentence itself. The adverbial µετ τοτο meta touto ‘after that’ is compatible

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!