Aspect in Ancient Greek - Nijmegen Centre for Semantics

More documents

Recommendations

Info

192 Appendix B: Examples spelled out= λQ[tTT ≺ n ⊕Q(t TT)](λPλt[eτ(e) ⊆ t ⊕P(e)](λPλe[ e ′e ⊏ e ′ → ¬ [ ⊕P(e ′ )]⊕P(e)](λe i senator(e))))≡ λQ[tTT ≺ n ⊕Q(t TT)](λPλt[eτ(e) ⊆ t ⊕P(e)](λe[ e ′e ⊏ e ′ → ¬ [ ⊕ λe i senator(e)(e ′ )]⊕ λe i senator(e)(e)]))≡ λQ[tTT ≺ n ⊕Q(t TT)](λPλt[eτ(e) ⊆ t ⊕P(e)](λe[ e ′e ⊏ e ′ → ¬ [ ⊕ i senator(e ′ ) ] ⊕ i senator(e)]))≡ λQ[tTT ≺ n ⊕Q(t TT)](λPλt[eτ(e) ⊆ t ⊕P(e)](λe[ e ′⊕ i senator(e)]))e ⊏ e ′ → ¬ i senator(e ′ )≡ λQ[tTT ≺ n ⊕Q(t TT)](λPλt[eτ(e) ⊆ t ⊕P(e)](λee ′i senator(e)))e ⊏ e ′ → ¬ i senator(e ′ )
Appendix B: Examples spelled out 193≡ λQ[tTT ≺ n ⊕Q(t TT)](λt[eτ(e) ⊆ t ⊕ λee ′i senator(e)e ⊏ e ′ → ¬ i senator(e ′ )(e)])≡ λQ[tTT ≺ n ⊕Q(t TT)](λt[eτ(e) ⊆ t ⊕e ′i senator(e)e ⊏ e ′ → ¬ i senator(e ′ )])ei senator(e)≡ λQ[tTT ≺ n ⊕Q(t TT)](λte ′e ⊏ e ′ → ¬ i senator(e ′ )τ(e) ⊆ t)ei senator(e)≡tTT ≺ n ⊕ λt e ′(t TT )e ⊏ e ′ → ¬ i senator(e ′ )τ(e) ⊆ tei senator(e)≡tTT ≺ n ⊕ e ′e ⊏ e ′ → ¬ i senator(e ′ )ei senator(e)τ(e) ⊆ t TT≡e ′e ⊏ e ′ → ¬ i senator(e ′ )τ(e) ⊆ t TTt TT ≺ n(221) PAST(AOR(INGR(λe x cry(e)))) ad (115)
Page 3:
Aspect in Ancient GreekA semantic a
Page 6 and 7:
viNick Asher, David Beaver, the lat
Page 9:
Contentsix8 Conclusions and discuss
Page 12 and 13:
2 Chapter 1. Introductiongroundbrea
Page 14 and 15:
4 Chapter 1. Introduction(4) µετ
Page 16 and 17:
6 Chapter 1. Introductionimperfecti
Page 19 and 20:
1.3 Organisation of the thesis 9In
Page 21 and 22:
Chapter 2The interpretations of aor
Page 23 and 24:
2.3 Additional interpretations of t
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31:
2.5 The challenge 21scriptions of h
Page 34 and 35:
24 Chapter 3. Aspect in formal sema
Page 36 and 37:
Page 38 and 39:
Page 40 and 41:
Page 42 and 43:
Page 44 and 45:
Page 46 and 47:
Page 48 and 49:
Page 50 and 51:
Page 52:
Page 57 and 58:
3.2 The perfective-imperfective dis
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
3.3 Aspectual coercion 673.3.1 Aspe
Page 79 and 80:
3.3 Aspectual coercion 69bials ((88
Page 81 and 82:
3.3 Aspectual coercion 71the term c
Page 83 and 84:
3.3 Aspectual coercion 73in the ext
Page 86 and 87:
76 Chapter 4. An analysis of aorist
Page 88 and 89:
Page 90 and 91:
Page 92 and 93:
Page 94 and 95:
Page 96 and 97:
Page 98 and 99:
Page 100 and 101:
Page 102 and 103:
Page 104 and 105:
Page 106 and 107:
Page 108 and 109:
Page 110 and 111:
100 Chapter 4. An analysis of aoris
Page 112 and 113:
Page 114 and 115:
Page 116 and 117:
Page 118 and 119:
Page 120 and 121:
Page 122 and 123:
Page 124 and 125:
Page 126 and 127:
Page 128 and 129:
Page 130 and 131:
Page 132 and 133:
122 Chapter 5. Aspect and performat
Page 134 and 135:
Page 136 and 137:
Page 138 and 139:
Page 140 and 141:
Page 142 and 143:
Page 144 and 145:
134 Chapter 6. The temporal structu
Page 146 and 147:
Page 148 and 149:
Page 150 and 151:
Page 152 and 153: 142 Chapter 6. The temporal structu
Page 168 and 169: 158 Chapter 7. Comparison to theori
Page 182 and 183: 172 Chapter 8. Conclusions and disc
Page 188 and 189: 178 Appendix A: The language of Com
Page 204 and 205: 194 Appendix B: Examples spelled ou
Page 216 and 217: 206 Appendix C: List of abbreviatio
Page 218 and 219: 208 Appendix C: List of abbreviatio
Page 220 and 221: 210 References(Eds.), Cross-linguis
Page 222 and 223: 212 ReferencesGrice, P. (1975). Log
Page 224 and 225: 214 ReferencesLemmon, E. J. (1962).
Page 226 and 227: 216 Referencesvan der Sandt, R. (19
Page 228 and 229: 218 References
Page 230 and 231: 220 Samenvatting (Summary in Dutch)
Page 232 and 233: 222 Samenvatting (Summary in Dutch)
show all

Aspect in Ancient Greek - Nijmegen Centre for Semantics

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?