13.07.2015 Views

Aspect in Ancient Greek - Nijmegen Centre for Semantics

Aspect in Ancient Greek - Nijmegen Centre for Semantics

Aspect in Ancient Greek - Nijmegen Centre for Semantics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

142 Chapter 6. The temporal structure of discourse(169) Pierre e n t r a. MariePierre enter.pst.PFV.3sg. Marie“Pierre entered. Marie phoned.”t é l é p h o n a.phone.pst.PFV.3sgThe second sentence of (169) is <strong>in</strong>terpreted <strong>in</strong> the context of the first sentence.Push<strong>in</strong>g and pull<strong>in</strong>g accounts differ with respect to the representationthey assign to the first sentence. We are familiar with (170) (= (46)), therepresentation on the pull<strong>in</strong>g account of Kamp et al.:(170)n e 1 t 1 t 2p enter(e 1 )τ(e 1 ) = t 1t 1 ⊆ t 2t 2 ≺ nPush<strong>in</strong>g accounts, on the other hand, let the first sentence <strong>in</strong>troduce an additionaltime compared to pull<strong>in</strong>g accounts, viz. a time t 3 immediately follow<strong>in</strong>gthe time of the eventuality t 1 :(171)n e 1 t 1 t 2 t 3p enter(e 1 )τ(e 1 ) = t 1t 1 ⊆ t 2t 1 ⊃≺ t 3t 2 ≺ nThe two accounts also differ with respect to the prelim<strong>in</strong>ary representationof the second sentence. The pull<strong>in</strong>g account of Kamp et al. gives (172), mypush<strong>in</strong>g account (173):(172)e 2 t 3 t 4m phone(e 2 )τ(e 2 ) = t 3t 3 ⊆ t 4t 4 ≺ nt 5ρ(t 5 ,t 4 )

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!