13.07.2015 Views

Aspect in Ancient Greek - Nijmegen Centre for Semantics

Aspect in Ancient Greek - Nijmegen Centre for Semantics

Aspect in Ancient Greek - Nijmegen Centre for Semantics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

16 Chapter 2. The <strong>in</strong>terpretations of aoristic and imperfective aspectaga<strong>in</strong>st the Tegeans.” Hdt. 1.65.1Aga<strong>in</strong>, the imperfective <strong>for</strong>m προσ έπταιον proseptaion ‘suffered a defeat’ (lit.‘bumped <strong>in</strong>to’) should be <strong>in</strong>terpreted habitually rather than as describ<strong>in</strong>g as<strong>in</strong>gle eventuality of suffer<strong>in</strong>g a defeat that is go<strong>in</strong>g on.2.3.2 The conative and likelihood <strong>in</strong>terpretationsImperfective aspect can also be used to refer to eventualities that do not gobeyond the stage of an attempt. This is the so-called conative <strong>in</strong>terpretation.Consider the follow<strong>in</strong>g example:(17) πεθµησεepethumēseτ̋ χλανίδο̋tēs chlanidoslong.<strong>for</strong>.pst.aor.3sg the.gen garment.genκα ατνkai autēnandπροσελθνproselthōn ν έ ε τ ο.ōneeto.hogo.to.aor.ptcp.nom buy.pst.IPFV.3sg the.nomΣυλοσνSulosōnSyloson.nom.........πωλέωpōleōsell.prs.ipfv.1sgλέγειlegei:say.prs.ipfv.3sgµνmenprtοδεν̋oudenosno.genγegōI.nomχρήµατο̋,chrēmatos,money.genτατηνtautēnthat.accthat.accδdeprtδίδωµιdidōmigive.prs.ipfv.1sgδdeprtλλω̋allōs<strong>for</strong>.noth<strong>in</strong>g“He set his heart upon the garment, came <strong>for</strong>ward and wanted to buyit. But Syloson said: ‘I don’t sell that one <strong>for</strong> any money, but I giveit <strong>for</strong> free.’ ” Hdt. 3.139.2-3It is clear from the cont<strong>in</strong>uation that the buy<strong>in</strong>g eventuality <strong>in</strong> the first sentencedoes not exceed the stage of an attempt: Syloson doesn’t sell the garment.Some grammars (<strong>for</strong> example, Rijksbaron 2002:3) note that this <strong>in</strong>terpretationoccurs only with bounded predicates and results from the comb<strong>in</strong>ationof the property boundedness and the basic <strong>in</strong>terpretation of imperfective aspectas go<strong>in</strong>g on. The dist<strong>in</strong>ction between bounded and unbounded predicates,which was mentioned briefly <strong>in</strong> section 1.2.3 and will be discussed at greaterlength <strong>in</strong> chapters 3 and 4, is <strong>in</strong>deed relevant <strong>for</strong> this <strong>in</strong>terpretation of imperfectiveaspect, as we will see.Related to this <strong>in</strong>terpretation is the likelihood <strong>in</strong>terpretation (see, <strong>for</strong> example,Goodw<strong>in</strong> 1966:441, Rijksbaron 2002:17), which expresses that an eventualitywas likely to occur, or threatened to occur. καινµην eka<strong>in</strong>omēn ‘be

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!