13.07.2015 Views

Aspect in Ancient Greek - Nijmegen Centre for Semantics

Aspect in Ancient Greek - Nijmegen Centre for Semantics

Aspect in Ancient Greek - Nijmegen Centre for Semantics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

158 Chapter 7. Comparison to theories <strong>in</strong> Classicsou d’un moment simplement présent dans l’esprit du locuteur. Lemoment donné est le po<strong>in</strong>t d’orientation.(In the case of the moment donné, it can be the present moment,the <strong>in</strong>itial moment of another action mentioned <strong>in</strong> the context, ora moment that is simply present <strong>in</strong> the m<strong>in</strong>d of the speaker. Themoment donné is the orientation po<strong>in</strong>t.) Ruijgh (1991:199)The moment donné is not an anaphor, s<strong>in</strong>ce it often is a time that will be <strong>in</strong>troduced<strong>in</strong> the follow<strong>in</strong>g discourse rather than a time that has been <strong>in</strong>troducedalready. 1A second difference between the two accounts becomes clear when we considerthe temporal relation they assign to imperfective and aoristic aspect.This temporal relation is roughly the same <strong>in</strong> case of the imperfective, as bothaccounts take the eventuality time to <strong>in</strong>clude the moment donné/topic time,which yields the effect that the eventuality is ‘not yet completed’. The twoaccounts assign different temporal relations to the aorist, however. To captureits value of completion, Ruijgh locates the eventuality time be<strong>for</strong>e themoment donné, whereas I locate it with<strong>in</strong> the topic time. 2 The two proposalsare represented graphically <strong>in</strong> Figure 7.1.aoristimperfectivemy accounttopic timeeventuality timeRuijgh’s accountmoment donnéeventuality timeFigure 7.1: My account of grammatical aspect versus Ruijgh’s1 See, <strong>for</strong> example, Hettrich’s (1976) test of Ruijgh’s (1971) account, <strong>in</strong> particular, pp.33–34.2 This is clear from the follow<strong>in</strong>g citation:Le TPr [imperfective aspect] exprime qu’à un moment donné par la situationou le contexte, l’action exprimée par le thème verbal est encore en cours. LeTAo [aoristic aspect] exprime qu’avant un MD [moment donné], l’action a déjàété achevée (ou f<strong>in</strong>ie).(The TPr [imperfective aspect] <strong>in</strong>dicates that the action expressed by theverbal theme is still go<strong>in</strong>g on at a moment given by the situation or context.The TAor [aoristic aspect] expresses that the action has already been achieved(or f<strong>in</strong>ished) be<strong>for</strong>e an MD [moment donné]) Ruijgh (1985:9)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!