13.07.2015 Views

Aspect in Ancient Greek - Nijmegen Centre for Semantics

Aspect in Ancient Greek - Nijmegen Centre for Semantics

Aspect in Ancient Greek - Nijmegen Centre for Semantics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

4.9 The conative and likelihood <strong>in</strong>terpretations 111e 1e...................................................................................... 2e 3e 4t TTFigure 4.11: Imperfective aspect <strong>in</strong>tensionalisedabout what happens <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>ertia worlds dur<strong>in</strong>g t TT , a claim is made aboutthe actual world dur<strong>in</strong>g t TT as well. In this way, the <strong>in</strong>tuition is captured thatthis t TT , which is the topic time, is the time ‘about which we speak’, s<strong>in</strong>ce itis only as far as t TT is concerned that (by say<strong>in</strong>g someth<strong>in</strong>g about the <strong>in</strong>ertiaworlds) someth<strong>in</strong>g is said about the actual world. 17 This nice consequence ofIMP ′ is absent <strong>in</strong> IMP.Note that this <strong>in</strong>tensionalisation of the imperfective operator does not affectits <strong>in</strong>terpretation with unbounded predicates. For an unbounded predicate Pwe get that if IMP(P) is true of the topic time, and hence <strong>in</strong> all <strong>in</strong>ertia worldsthere is a P eventuality e of whose runtime τ(e) the topic time is a nonf<strong>in</strong>alsubset, it is (due to the divisivity of P) probable that <strong>in</strong> those worldsthere is also a P eventuality e ′ temporally <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> the topic time, and thiseventuality takes place <strong>in</strong> the actual world as well (due to the fact that allthese <strong>in</strong>ertia worlds are identical to the actual world up to and <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g thetopic time). This is illustrated <strong>in</strong> Figure 4.12. This result is exactly what wewant, <strong>for</strong> the imperfective paradox is restricted to bounded predicates.. . . . . . e 1τ(ee...................................................... ′ )................................ 2e 3........................ e 4t TTFigure 4.12: Imperfective aspect <strong>in</strong>tensionalised <strong>for</strong> unbounded predicatesA possible objection to this <strong>in</strong>tensionalisation of the semantics of imperfectiveaspect may be that as a result imperfective aspect does someth<strong>in</strong>g completelydifferent from aoristic aspect, (101b). This objection does not hold,17 Admittedly, by say<strong>in</strong>g someth<strong>in</strong>g about the <strong>in</strong>ertia worlds, we also say someth<strong>in</strong>g aboutthe actual world be<strong>for</strong>e the topic time. The crucial th<strong>in</strong>g, however, is that we don’t saysometh<strong>in</strong>g about the actual world after the topic time.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!