13.07.2015 Views

Aspect in Ancient Greek - Nijmegen Centre for Semantics

Aspect in Ancient Greek - Nijmegen Centre for Semantics

Aspect in Ancient Greek - Nijmegen Centre for Semantics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

6.3 Analys<strong>in</strong>g the patterns 151him say<strong>in</strong>g: ‘What a distance is there between what you are do<strong>in</strong>gnow and a little while ago! After declar<strong>in</strong>g yourself happy you weep.’” Hdt. 7.45-46.1In section 4.5 I mentioned as the reason <strong>for</strong> gett<strong>in</strong>g an <strong>in</strong>gressive <strong>in</strong>terpretation<strong>in</strong> (189) that it is clear from the cont<strong>in</strong>uation that Xerxes is still cry<strong>in</strong>g at themoment of Artabanus’ utterance. What is implicit <strong>in</strong> the argument is theassumption that aoristic aspect pushes the topic time <strong>for</strong>ward, an assumptionthat we have made explicit <strong>in</strong> this chapter. Let’s see how this assumptionyields the <strong>in</strong>gressive <strong>in</strong>terpretation.The second clause of (189) <strong>in</strong>troduces an eventuality <strong>in</strong> the discourse, e 1 <strong>in</strong>Figure 6.4, that is related to cry<strong>in</strong>g. It may be a maximal cry<strong>in</strong>g eventuality oran <strong>in</strong>gressive one. Which of the two is unknown at this po<strong>in</strong>t <strong>in</strong> the discourse.S<strong>in</strong>ce the sentence has aoristic aspect, this cry<strong>in</strong>g related eventuality is temporally<strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> the topic time t TT1 . Moreover, the aoristic aspect <strong>in</strong>troduces<strong>in</strong>to the discourse a time immediately follow<strong>in</strong>g the cry<strong>in</strong>g related eventuality.This time t TT2 acts as topic time <strong>for</strong> the next sentence. S<strong>in</strong>ce the participleµαθών mathōn ‘perceive.aor’ has aoristic aspect too, follow<strong>in</strong>g the same recipeit <strong>in</strong>troduces <strong>in</strong>to the discourse an eventuality e 2 <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> t TT2 and a timefollow<strong>in</strong>g this eventuality, t TT3 , which acts as topic time <strong>for</strong> the ma<strong>in</strong> clause.The say<strong>in</strong>g eventuality e 3 is temporally <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> t TT3 . 10 Artabanus uses apresent tense (imperfective aspect) to describe a cry<strong>in</strong>g eventuality e 4 , which<strong>in</strong>dicates that this eventuality temporally <strong>in</strong>cludes the time of his utterance.t TT1τ(e 1 )t TT2τ(e 2 )t TT3τ(e 3 )τ(e 4 )Figure 6.4: Apply<strong>in</strong>g the rules to (189)Let’s now return to δάκρυσε edakruse ‘cry.aor’ <strong>in</strong> the first sentence. If10 ερετο eireto ‘say’ is an imperfective <strong>for</strong>m. It is a common phenomenon <strong>in</strong> <strong>Ancient</strong> <strong>Greek</strong>that verbs of say<strong>in</strong>g occur <strong>in</strong> the imperfective <strong>for</strong>m where we would expect an aorist, viz. <strong>for</strong>complete eventualities. I return to this <strong>in</strong> section 7.3. For the present example it makes nodifference s<strong>in</strong>ce the aorist <strong>for</strong>ms δάκρυσε edakrusa ‘cry’ and µαθών mathōn ‘perceive’ pushthe time <strong>for</strong>ward already.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!