Aspect in Ancient Greek - Nijmegen Centre for Semantics
Aspect in Ancient Greek - Nijmegen Centre for Semantics
Aspect in Ancient Greek - Nijmegen Centre for Semantics
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
6.3 Analys<strong>in</strong>g the patterns 151him say<strong>in</strong>g: ‘What a distance is there between what you are do<strong>in</strong>gnow and a little while ago! After declar<strong>in</strong>g yourself happy you weep.’” Hdt. 7.45-46.1In section 4.5 I mentioned as the reason <strong>for</strong> gett<strong>in</strong>g an <strong>in</strong>gressive <strong>in</strong>terpretation<strong>in</strong> (189) that it is clear from the cont<strong>in</strong>uation that Xerxes is still cry<strong>in</strong>g at themoment of Artabanus’ utterance. What is implicit <strong>in</strong> the argument is theassumption that aoristic aspect pushes the topic time <strong>for</strong>ward, an assumptionthat we have made explicit <strong>in</strong> this chapter. Let’s see how this assumptionyields the <strong>in</strong>gressive <strong>in</strong>terpretation.The second clause of (189) <strong>in</strong>troduces an eventuality <strong>in</strong> the discourse, e 1 <strong>in</strong>Figure 6.4, that is related to cry<strong>in</strong>g. It may be a maximal cry<strong>in</strong>g eventuality oran <strong>in</strong>gressive one. Which of the two is unknown at this po<strong>in</strong>t <strong>in</strong> the discourse.S<strong>in</strong>ce the sentence has aoristic aspect, this cry<strong>in</strong>g related eventuality is temporally<strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> the topic time t TT1 . Moreover, the aoristic aspect <strong>in</strong>troduces<strong>in</strong>to the discourse a time immediately follow<strong>in</strong>g the cry<strong>in</strong>g related eventuality.This time t TT2 acts as topic time <strong>for</strong> the next sentence. S<strong>in</strong>ce the participleµαθών mathōn ‘perceive.aor’ has aoristic aspect too, follow<strong>in</strong>g the same recipeit <strong>in</strong>troduces <strong>in</strong>to the discourse an eventuality e 2 <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> t TT2 and a timefollow<strong>in</strong>g this eventuality, t TT3 , which acts as topic time <strong>for</strong> the ma<strong>in</strong> clause.The say<strong>in</strong>g eventuality e 3 is temporally <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> t TT3 . 10 Artabanus uses apresent tense (imperfective aspect) to describe a cry<strong>in</strong>g eventuality e 4 , which<strong>in</strong>dicates that this eventuality temporally <strong>in</strong>cludes the time of his utterance.t TT1τ(e 1 )t TT2τ(e 2 )t TT3τ(e 3 )τ(e 4 )Figure 6.4: Apply<strong>in</strong>g the rules to (189)Let’s now return to δάκρυσε edakruse ‘cry.aor’ <strong>in</strong> the first sentence. If10 ερετο eireto ‘say’ is an imperfective <strong>for</strong>m. It is a common phenomenon <strong>in</strong> <strong>Ancient</strong> <strong>Greek</strong>that verbs of say<strong>in</strong>g occur <strong>in</strong> the imperfective <strong>for</strong>m where we would expect an aorist, viz. <strong>for</strong>complete eventualities. I return to this <strong>in</strong> section 7.3. For the present example it makes nodifference s<strong>in</strong>ce the aorist <strong>for</strong>ms δάκρυσε edakrusa ‘cry’ and µαθών mathōn ‘perceive’ pushthe time <strong>for</strong>ward already.