13.07.2015 Views

Aspect in Ancient Greek - Nijmegen Centre for Semantics

Aspect in Ancient Greek - Nijmegen Centre for Semantics

Aspect in Ancient Greek - Nijmegen Centre for Semantics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

2.4 Additional <strong>in</strong>terpretations of the aorist 192.4.2 The complexive <strong>in</strong>terpretationThe <strong>in</strong>gressive <strong>in</strong>terpretation is not the only <strong>in</strong>terpretation of aoristic aspectwith unbounded predicates; it can also be read as <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g that the eventualityis completed. An example of this use is βολευσα ebouleusa ‘be senator.aor’<strong>in</strong> (21):(21) γegōγάρ,gar,I.nom prtρχνarchēnoffice.accπλει,polei,state.datōvcpοδεµίανoudemianno.accνδρε̋andresmen.vocπώποτεpōpoteeverΑθηναοι,Athēnaioi,Athenian.voc β ο λ ε υ σ αebouleusabe.senator.pst.AOR.1sgλληνallēnother.accρξαērxarule.pst.aor.1sgδέdeprtνen<strong>in</strong>µνmenthoughτtēithe.dat“I (= Socrates), men of Athens, never held any other office <strong>in</strong> thestate, but I was a senator.”Pl. Ap. 32aHere the speaker, Socrates, makes reference to the complete eventuality ofbe<strong>in</strong>g a senator rather than to the beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g.I will restrict the label completive to the <strong>in</strong>terpretation of completion ofthe aorist with bounded predicates and will use complexive <strong>for</strong> the completion<strong>in</strong>terpretation of the aorist with unbounded predicates as <strong>in</strong> (21). Whetherthe two <strong>in</strong>terpretations are the same or different depends on the analysis ofthe semantics of the aorist. S<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>in</strong> the account I will defend <strong>in</strong> this thesis thecomb<strong>in</strong>ation of the aorist with bounded predicates is analysed differently thanthe comb<strong>in</strong>ation with unbounded predicates, it is convenient to have dist<strong>in</strong>ctlabels <strong>for</strong> the two.2.4.3 The tragic <strong>in</strong>terpretationMany grammars (e.g., Kühner and Gerth 1898:163, Goodw<strong>in</strong> 1966:18) notethat the <strong>for</strong>m <strong>for</strong> past tense and aoristic aspect is sometimes used to refer topresent eventualities. This use of the aorist, called tragic or dramatic aoristbecause it occurs ma<strong>in</strong>ly <strong>in</strong> drama, is often used <strong>in</strong> dialogues. The traditionalview, as <strong>for</strong> <strong>in</strong>stance found <strong>in</strong> Kühner and Gerth (1898:163-165), is that itdescribes a present eventuality as if it had already happened or begun. Thisuse of the aorist is restricted to the first person and common with verbs ofjudgement or emotion <strong>in</strong> response to someth<strong>in</strong>g said by someone else. Insuch cases it is claimed to <strong>in</strong>dicate that the speaker had begun to make thejudgement or feel the emotion be<strong>for</strong>e his <strong>in</strong>terlocutor has f<strong>in</strong>ished speak<strong>in</strong>g.An example is given <strong>in</strong> (22), where Iphigeneia reacts to Orestes’ proposal to

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!