Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
problems that Black people faced. On <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand, in <strong>the</strong> observations,<br />
we can see a trend that continues today: <strong>the</strong> need to compare two forms <strong>of</strong><br />
oppression and ignore <strong>the</strong> complexities <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> conditions that ano<strong>the</strong>r<br />
oppressed group faces.<br />
During <strong>the</strong> 1930s and through <strong>the</strong> 1940s, New Deal policies <strong>of</strong>fered new<br />
protections for white Americans. This was a period <strong>of</strong> great reform that also<br />
fur<strong>the</strong>r embedded racism. For <strong>Indigenous</strong> people, <strong>the</strong>y experienced<br />
significant changes as a result <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Indian Reorganization Act <strong>of</strong> 1934<br />
(IRA), albeit with mixed results. Signed into law by President Franklin<br />
Roosevelt as <strong>the</strong> Wheeler-Howard Act, <strong>the</strong> IRA was designed to compel<br />
tribal nations to implement constitutions that would be legible to <strong>the</strong> US<br />
government; however, it <strong>of</strong>ten created o<strong>the</strong>r problems, including<br />
undermining traditional leadership styles for particular nations and<br />
effectively forcing <strong>the</strong>m to reform <strong>the</strong>ir structures <strong>of</strong> governance, in order to<br />
receive federal funds. It seems eerily similar to <strong>the</strong> logic <strong>of</strong> postwar<br />
structural adjustment policies forced upon countries on <strong>the</strong> African<br />
continent and in South America! Above all, <strong>the</strong> IRA created an unclear<br />
notion <strong>of</strong> tribal sovereignty in regard to <strong>the</strong> exercise <strong>of</strong> power and <strong>the</strong><br />
ability to govern tribal members and implement justice. 2<br />
Throughout <strong>the</strong> 1940s, Black Americans also continued to experience<br />
different forms <strong>of</strong> oppression. They moved from sou<strong>the</strong>rn states to nor<strong>the</strong>rn<br />
cities to escape Jim Crow racism in <strong>the</strong> South. What <strong>the</strong>y thought was a<br />
promised land <strong>of</strong> integration ended up being one <strong>of</strong> segregation. In nor<strong>the</strong>rn<br />
cities like Detroit, a combination <strong>of</strong> white homeowners, homeownership<br />
organizations, local government <strong>of</strong>ficials, and federal housing policies was<br />
created to keep Black people from integrating into all-white<br />
neighborhoods. 3 At <strong>the</strong> same time, <strong>the</strong> US carved an easy path to middle<br />
class stability through <strong>the</strong> creation <strong>of</strong> suburbs, Social Security, and housing<br />
policies that fostered homeownership. As political scientist Ira Katznelson<br />
contends, this was a period when “affirmative action,” which we typically<br />
think is for African Americans and o<strong>the</strong>r people <strong>of</strong> color, benefited white<br />
people. To be clear, affirmative action as an <strong>of</strong>ficial policy did not emerge<br />
until <strong>the</strong> late 1960s, but, as Katznelson asserts, contemporary conservative<br />
arguments that <strong>the</strong> federal government “gives” people <strong>of</strong> color handouts via<br />
affirmative action ignores <strong>the</strong> longer history <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> federal government<br />
actually creating policies that supported white people largely. These<br />
policies, such as <strong>the</strong> homeownership subsidies that created <strong>the</strong> racial wealth