Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
2. You know how <strong>Indigenous</strong> Nations in North America could assert<br />
<strong>the</strong>ir sovereignty and right to self-determination? They can make new<br />
agreements, arrangements, treaties—whatever you want to call it—<br />
with Black people and o<strong>the</strong>r people <strong>of</strong> color. They can reimagine<br />
sovereignty. Begin finding ways to incorporate Black folks into <strong>the</strong>ir<br />
spaces and cultures. I’m not sure how this would look nation to nation,<br />
but we can look at <strong>the</strong> very small example <strong>of</strong> how <strong>the</strong> Standing Rock<br />
Sioux engaged with NBA basketball star Kyrie Irving (and his sister)<br />
by formally reconnecting <strong>the</strong>m. For those who might be skeptical, ask<br />
yourselves this question: what do we have to lose? I think it has <strong>the</strong><br />
potential to end antiblackness in Native communities and end<br />
<strong>Indigenous</strong> erasure in Black communities. Given <strong>the</strong> nature <strong>of</strong><br />
patriarchy, it might be best that <strong>Indigenous</strong> and Black femmes, nongender-conforming<br />
people, or more precisely, Black/<strong>Indigenous</strong><br />
femmes and non-gender-conforming people, meet and negotiate how<br />
this might work. 36<br />
3. If tribal nations recreate new relationships, even political<br />
arrangements with Black folks, <strong>the</strong>y might also consider fur<strong>the</strong>r<br />
rethinking <strong>the</strong> nature <strong>of</strong> treaties within <strong>the</strong> context <strong>of</strong> US liberal<br />
democracy. If liberal democracy is an ongoing project that continues<br />
to fail (can we really redeem <strong>the</strong> soul <strong>of</strong> this nation or is it like<br />
Lucifer, <strong>the</strong> fallen angel?), <strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong> treaties need to take on a new<br />
meaning, and we need to imagine how treaties will look in <strong>the</strong><br />
aftermath <strong>of</strong> colonialism. Treaties are important, even sacrosanct to<br />
many tribal nations. They are a product <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sustained US genocide<br />
against <strong>Indigenous</strong> nations. Tribal nations might consider <strong>the</strong>m sacred,<br />
but <strong>the</strong> US government sure doesn’t, and <strong>the</strong> majority were created<br />
with a power imbalance in mind. The treaties have to be honored by<br />
both groups, and since <strong>the</strong> US government has violated every single<br />
one, are <strong>the</strong>y, in fact, sacred anymore? From <strong>the</strong> get-go, <strong>the</strong> US<br />
Constitution has more authority than a treaty, as that is considered <strong>the</strong><br />
supreme law <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> land. 37 Treaties are entangled with US liberal<br />
democracy. The US government has shown it can’t be trusted.<br />
<strong>Indigenous</strong> scholars such as Glen Coulthard (Yellowknives Dené) and<br />
Audra Simpson (Mohawk) have helped us fur<strong>the</strong>r think about how we<br />
might reject colonial land and political arrangements, so maybe we<br />
need to rethink our relationship to treaties, or at least how <strong>the</strong>y relate