Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
emind people that <strong>the</strong> US government created treaties with some tribal<br />
nations and explicitly stated in <strong>the</strong>m that those nations must return enslaved<br />
Africans. For example, Article VII <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Treaty with <strong>the</strong> Florida Tribes <strong>of</strong><br />
Indians (1823) stated that <strong>the</strong>y would not harbor enslaved Africans, and had<br />
to exert all <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir will to apprehend <strong>the</strong>m. The agent assigned to <strong>the</strong>m<br />
would compensate <strong>the</strong>m for expenses incurred retrieving enslaved<br />
Africans. 2 These arrangements were also included in a Treaty with <strong>the</strong><br />
Delawares (1778). Again, if we demand that <strong>the</strong> US government honor <strong>the</strong><br />
treaties and respect tribal sovereignty, does that mean every article <strong>of</strong> those<br />
treaties? I would hope not. I can’t recall tribal nations for whom capturing<br />
slaves was in <strong>the</strong>ir treaties mentioning this. The particular legacy <strong>of</strong><br />
capturing enslaved Africans and returning <strong>the</strong>m to <strong>the</strong>ir enslavers for<br />
money ain’t nothing but bondage money. I wonder how much <strong>the</strong>se tribes<br />
were paid to commit <strong>the</strong>se acts? I guess Black bondage was <strong>the</strong> price <strong>of</strong><br />
admission to civilization for those tribes.<br />
<strong>An</strong>o<strong>the</strong>r significant subject <strong>of</strong> conversation regarding this topic is <strong>the</strong><br />
question <strong>of</strong> racism, and <strong>the</strong> argument that because tribes are not a race, any<br />
accusation <strong>of</strong> racism is irrelevant, even distracting. As those in support <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> Five Tribes’ sovereignty and <strong>the</strong> expulsion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Freedmen argue, <strong>the</strong><br />
Five Tribes don’t want <strong>the</strong> inclusion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Freedmen not because <strong>the</strong>y are<br />
Black, but because <strong>the</strong>y were not citizens, and <strong>the</strong> US government forced<br />
<strong>the</strong>m to adopt <strong>the</strong>m. They fur<strong>the</strong>r argue that this is a matter <strong>of</strong> sovereignty,<br />
not Black civil rights. 3 <strong>An</strong>d Natives, even some <strong>of</strong> y’all’s favorite scholar’s<br />
favorite scholar, jump through a lot <strong>of</strong> hoops to emphasize this point. If that<br />
ain’t no anti-Black discourse! Let me <strong>of</strong>fer a brief, summative history as to<br />
why <strong>the</strong>y enslaved Africans in <strong>the</strong> first place.<br />
The Five Tribes all enslaved Africans to demonstrate that <strong>the</strong>y were<br />
“civilized.” Who were <strong>the</strong>y trying to prove <strong>the</strong>ir civility to? White America.<br />
Why? To halt <strong>the</strong> US from encroaching fur<strong>the</strong>r on <strong>the</strong>ir land. I think this is<br />
only a part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> reason. I believe that some <strong>of</strong> those elite members <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
Five Tribes wanted to adopt American capitalism. They wanted money, and<br />
<strong>the</strong>y understood that enslaving and exploiting Africans would help <strong>the</strong>m<br />
earn wealth, and <strong>the</strong>refore would allow <strong>the</strong>m to at least be civilized and<br />
connected to whiteness, if not become fully civilized.<br />
During <strong>the</strong> Civil War, some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Five Tribes signed treaties with <strong>the</strong><br />
Confederacy. Yes, some did so reluctantly, and yes, <strong>the</strong>re were factions, but<br />
here we are. Yes, <strong>the</strong>y brokered deals with <strong>the</strong> “country” that wanted to