Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
had it worse than Native folks, it is clear that he, if not knowing <strong>the</strong>ir<br />
present condition, did understand that anti-<strong>Indigenous</strong> sentiments were just<br />
as bad for Native people. Three additional civil rights icons who also<br />
engaged in this rhetoric were Fannie Lou Hamer, Martin Lu<strong>the</strong>r King Jr.,<br />
and Malcolm X. It is important to comment on how <strong>the</strong>se Black civil rights<br />
icons understood <strong>the</strong> <strong>Indigenous</strong> condition, for through <strong>the</strong>ir example we<br />
can learn how to think and, perhaps, even talk about solidarity with o<strong>the</strong>r<br />
oppressed groups, especially <strong>the</strong> original people <strong>of</strong> this land.<br />
James Baldwin, Fannie Lou Hamer, Malcolm X, and Martin Lu<strong>the</strong>r King<br />
Jr. all analyzed and criticized <strong>the</strong> Black American condition within US<br />
democracy. They also hoped to imagine a Black future where <strong>the</strong>y lived<br />
outside <strong>of</strong> white supremacy. It is important to discuss why I’m using <strong>the</strong>se<br />
civil rights icons as examples. In some ways, <strong>the</strong>se people represent two<br />
competing notions <strong>of</strong> Black belonging in US history, nationalism and<br />
integration. The late Black liberation <strong>the</strong>ologian James Cone argued that<br />
<strong>the</strong>se competing ideas were a response to enslavement and segregation. He<br />
also argued that no Black person or organization was purely nationalist or<br />
integrationist. Ra<strong>the</strong>r, each existed on a continuum, and desired different<br />
means on a path to Black liberation. 13<br />
Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, <strong>the</strong>se Black intellectual strands were based upon what one<br />
believed <strong>the</strong> potential <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> US could be. Today, when people tell Black,<br />
Latinx, or <strong>Indigenous</strong> protesters to “go back home” or to “leave <strong>the</strong><br />
country” it is an insult. They are suggesting that we all can’t do better and<br />
live with each o<strong>the</strong>r in peace. Black people have desired to largely reform<br />
<strong>the</strong> US. <strong>An</strong>d when <strong>the</strong>y could not because <strong>of</strong> white racism, <strong>the</strong>y sought<br />
o<strong>the</strong>r means, including separation. Baldwin, Hamer, Malcolm, and Martin<br />
exude what historian Peniel Joseph calls “radical black dignity.” 14 They<br />
challenged white supremacy and injustice and believed in <strong>the</strong> possibility <strong>of</strong><br />
racial and economic justice for Black Americans.<br />
It seems today that Dr. King is popular among a wide array <strong>of</strong> people.<br />
From right-wing pundits, to college football coaches who want to silence<br />
<strong>the</strong> protests <strong>of</strong> Black athletes, to socialists who want to highlight Dr. King’s<br />
critiques <strong>of</strong> capitalism, he remains as popular as ever. Dr. King belongs to<br />
everyone. According to a study released in 2008, Dr. King is <strong>the</strong> most wellknown<br />
figure in US history. 15 In <strong>the</strong> preface to A More Beautiful and<br />
Terrible <strong>History</strong>: The Uses and Misuses <strong>of</strong> Civil Rights <strong>History</strong> (2018),<br />
historian Jeanne Theoharis notes that Dr. King and o<strong>the</strong>r civil rights figures’