09.06.2022 Views

An Afro-Indigenous History of the United States

by Kyle T. Mays

by Kyle T. Mays

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

allowed that “[Natives] may, without a doubt, be naturalized by <strong>the</strong><br />

authority <strong>of</strong> Congress, and become citizens <strong>of</strong> a State, and <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>United</strong><br />

<strong>States</strong>.” 38 Taney continued: “If an individual should leave his nation or<br />

tribe, and take up his abode among <strong>the</strong> white population, he would be<br />

entitled to all <strong>the</strong> rights and privileges which would belong to an emigrant<br />

from any o<strong>the</strong>r foreign people.” 39 Taney opined that Native people could<br />

become citizens as long as <strong>the</strong>y assimilated and adopted whiteness, and<br />

Black people, under no circumstance, could not. Finally, Taney affirmed—<br />

within <strong>the</strong> confines <strong>of</strong> colonialism—<strong>the</strong> humanity <strong>of</strong> Native people, while<br />

asserting that Black folks were “articles <strong>of</strong> merchandise.”<br />

We see, again, that in US history, African and <strong>Indigenous</strong> peoples in <strong>the</strong><br />

US have been intimately linked. Even more, <strong>the</strong> creators <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> US nationstate<br />

and democratic project found ways to connect <strong>the</strong>m in unexpected<br />

ways, including via <strong>the</strong> legal realm.<br />

AMERICAN COLONIZATION SOCIETY<br />

White men in <strong>the</strong> early part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> nineteenth century understood <strong>the</strong><br />

connections between creating a white republic, removing Black and<br />

<strong>Indigenous</strong> peoples, and fur<strong>the</strong>r colonizing <strong>the</strong> land. It is no surprise that<br />

white politicians supported, across party lines, <strong>the</strong> American Colonization<br />

Society (ACS). Founded in 1816, <strong>the</strong> goal was to remove free African<br />

Americans and enslaved Africans and send <strong>the</strong>m to Africa so that <strong>the</strong>y<br />

could simultaneously abolish slavery, remove Black people, and create a<br />

white republic. White people at that time were scared. They had a reason to<br />

be concerned. Enslaved African insurrections were always possible, as<br />

demonstrated by Haiti, which through revolution became <strong>the</strong> first Black<br />

nation and <strong>the</strong> second independent democratic nation in <strong>the</strong> West. As<br />

historian Brandon Byrd argues, “In <strong>the</strong> antebellum <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong>, Haiti<br />

became synonymous with slave insurrection and black barbarism. It came<br />

to mean <strong>the</strong> specter <strong>of</strong> abolitionism, and for that it was shunned.” 40 For<br />

slave owners, Haiti, as a representation <strong>of</strong> Black revolutionary possibility,<br />

“undermined <strong>the</strong> power <strong>of</strong> white planters and businessmen who reaped<br />

from black labor <strong>the</strong> greatest pr<strong>of</strong>its that <strong>the</strong> world had ever seen.” For<br />

those looking for equality, “it encouraged o<strong>the</strong>r visions <strong>of</strong> emancipation and<br />

emboldened champions <strong>of</strong> racial equality.” 41 Thus, it is not surprising that

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!